^{page 110 note 1} PR 1 Richard I (Rec. Comm., 1844), 26.Google Scholar

^{page 112 note a} Ph' B (in error)

^{page 112 note b} Insert dimid' m' B (in error)

^{page 112 note c} Godefr' B (in error)

^{page 112 note d–d} A f 34r (slightly different word order)

^{page 112 note e–e} Om. in A

^{page 112 note f} Boistard A

^{page 112 note g} B adds in a later hand: in itinere W. de Raley in fine magni rotuli

^{page 112 note h-h} A f 34r

^{page 112 note i} concelamento A

^{page 112 note j} Clive A

^{page 112 note k} Om. in A

^{page 112 note l} B has xxvii, but xxvi is correct (see note 3)

^{page 112 note 1} PR 1 Richard I, 26Google Scholar. The extract also appears in no. 118.

^{page 112 note 2} PR 2 Richard I, 33Google Scholar. Another version of this is in no. 119.

^{page 112 note 3} PR 26 Henry III, 66.Google Scholar

^{page 112 note 1} This immediately follows a quite unconnected mandate by Henry III concerning quittance of scutage in Showell (no. 528).

^{page 113 note a} Interlined in A

^{page 113 note b} A has Avia (in error), Diva B, C

^{page 113 note c} Wlhavent' B, C

^{page 113 note d} Wlavint' B, C

^{page 113 note e} Scacc(ario) B, C

^{page 113 note f} B, C end

^{page 114 note a} Sic

^{page 117 note a} This and the following item appear in reverse order in Ms and marked for transposition

^{page 117 note b} Bracketed in Ms with next item

^{page 117 note c} For this expansion, see the Eyre Roll for 1241, PRO JUST 1/37, m. 35d

^{page 117 note d} Sic, probably error for pannis (see Eyre Roll, m. 35d)

^{page 117 note e} Bracketed in Ms with next two items

^{page 117 note f} Sic, probably error for disseis'

^{page 117 note g} Interlined

^{page 120 note a} Aldermanstone C

^{page 120 note 1} The printed text is slightly less extensive than that in the cartulary, for the latter includes quittance of tynpeni and the claims that the abbot's men are quit of assizes and recognitions and that the dogs of the abbot's men are quit of hambling.

^{page 121 note 1} The printed text is slightly different from that in the cartulary, for the latter, while omitting furcas, includes pillori and quittance of tynpeni and the abbot's claims to have free warren in all his lands and that his men are quit of assizes and recognitions. It concludes: Salvo iure domini regis cum inde loqui voluerit. See also no. 447.

^{page 121 note 2} The extreme right edge of the rubric was shaved when the folio was subsequently trimmed.

^{page 121 note 1} This text is the same as that in G, but slightly different from that in B, which may have been taken from another roll (see Crook, loc. cit.). The only significant difference in B, however, is that it calls the abbot's attorney Adam Scot, while G and the printed text have Andrew Scot. Cf. no. 558.

^{page 121 note 2} The extreme left edge of the rubric was shaved when the folio was subsequently trimmed.

^{page 122 note a} Supplied from rubric

^{page 122 note b} Supplied from rubric

^{page 123 note 1} Extreme right edge of rubric shaved by subsequent trimming of the folio.

^{page 124 note a} Haleday C

^{page 124 note b} Jeovene C

^{page 124 note c} Om. in C

^{page 124 note d} B has here predictarum deleted

^{page 124 note e} Insert inde C (in error)

^{page 125 note a} Monemuwe F

^{page 126 note 1} The only significant differences between the printed text and that in the cartularies are these:

For Abbat's de Hoctona (printed, para, 1, line 3) read Albodi de Hoctona

For Rogerum Vagel (para. 2, line 1) read Rogerum Vachel

After weyf (para. 2, line 7) add tanquam pertinentes ad terram suam predictam et cetera

The sentence Et de exitibus … Regi respondent (para. 7, lines 11–12) is omitted in the cartularies

The word alias (para. 9, line 16) is omitted in the cartularies.

^{page 128 note a} Ms has .xl., but see no. 120 and PR 1 Richard I, 26

^{page 128 note 1} In the margin of f 139v, where this account begins, partially trimmed and possibly not complete.