Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:33:12.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Reviews the Projects of Unaffiliated Researchers for Ethics? A Case Study from Alberta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2007

MAEVE O'BEIRNE ,
MICHAEL STINGL  and
SARAH HAYWARD
MAEVE O'BEIRNE
Affiliation:
Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MICHAEL STINGL
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
SARAH HAYWARD
Affiliation:
SEARCH, Edmonton, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developments in the last several years have sparked renewed interest in the ethics of research involving humans. Issues relating to the global extent of research and its guiding principles are of particular importance to researchers, health officials, and individual ethics committees who want a deeper and more encompassing inquiry regarding the foundation and evolution of human research. This department of CQ launches a long overdue effort to explore these wider issues. Readers are invited to submit papers to Charles MacKay, 5011 Worthington Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20816, USA. E-mail: [email protected].

Type
ETHICS OF HUMAN RESEARCH
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 346 - 355
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)