No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
In the language of secular bioethics, autonomy is always accorded first place in the hierarchy of values that has come to be referred to as the “Georgetown mantra” A dictionary definition of mantra is “a verbal spell, ritualistic incantation, or mystic formula used devotionally,” and the value placed upon autonomy is largely of this nature: uncritical and uncriticised. That there should be and are limits to autonomy is obvious, but these boundaries are undefined, little discussed, and mostly unexplored. To use another metaphor, our emphasis on autonomy is an index of how far the pendulum has swung in an understandable and partly justifiable reaction from, earlier paternalism; has this swing approached its proper limit, and should we be seeking a less extreme and more balanced assessment of autonomy as a bioethical value?
1. Rozovsky, LE. The Canadian Patient's Book of Rights. Toronto: Doubleday, 1980.Google Scholar
2. American Medical Association. Fundamental Rights of the Patient-Physician Relationship. Chicago: AMA, 1990.Google Scholar
3. An Act Providing Certain Rights to Patients. Massachusetts Acts of 1979, Chap. 14.
4. Consumers Association of Canada. Policy Statement on Consumers and Health Care. 1989.Google Scholar
5. Emson, HE. Rights, duties and responsibilities in health care. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1992;9:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rene Descartes. Le Discours de la Methode.
7. Steinbrook, R, Lo, B. The Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project; will it provide adequate medical care? New England Journal of Medicine 1992;326:340–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968;162:1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Hiatt, HH. Protecting the Medical Commons; who is responsible? New England Journal of Medicine 1975;293:235–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Daniels, N. Am I My Parents' Keeper? New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
11. Callahan, D. Setting Limits—Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987.Google Scholar
12. Trugg, RD, Brett, AS, Frader, J. The problem with futility. New England Journal of Medicine 1992;326:1560–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Callahan, D. Symbols, rationing and justice; rationing health care. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1992;18:1–13.Google ScholarPubMed