Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:31:26.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses to “Goldilocks and Mrs. Ilych: A Critical Look at the ‘Philosophy of Hospice’” (CQ Vol 6 No 3) by Felicia Ackerman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

Gretchen M. Brown
Affiliation:
Hospice of the Bluegrass

Abstract

The critical look at hospice care by Felicia Ackerman in Vol. 6 of the Cambridge Quarterly requires a response, since the author presents her view as having major implications for health policy. As a healthcare executive with over 25 years experience, and as a spokesperson for both my own program and others in the National Hospice Work Group, twelve of the nation's largest nonprofit hospices, I submit that her analysis of hospice care is naive. Ackerman's lack of practical understanding concerning the care of the terminally ill results in a discussion that misses the key policy issues.

Type
RESPONSES AND DIALOGUE
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)