Article contents
Response to “Advance Directives and Voluntary Slavery” by Christopher Tollefsen (CQ Vol 7, No 4)
Slavery, Commitment, and Choice: Do Advance Directives Reflect Autonomy?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 1999
Abstract
In an interesting response to an article I published in CQ that questions the ability of advance directives to reflect autonomy, Christopher Tollefsen raises a number of issues that deserve greater attention. Tollefsen offers several examples to illustrate how the critique of advance directives I offer would also threaten other choices that most people would consider autonomous. Importantly, I largely agree that the examples Tollefsen offers should be captured as autonomous. Where I disagree, however, is whether these examples reflect the particular type of second order decision strategy that I categorize advance directives as, and so whether the critique of advance directives I offer, if accepted, would commit us to an unreasonably narrow conception of autonomy.
- Type
- RESPONSES AND DIALOGUE
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1999 Cambridge University Press
- 3
- Cited by