Article contents
Research Ethics: International Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
In recent years, bioethics has increasingly become an international area of inquiry with major contributions being made not only in North America but also in Europe and in the Pacific Rim countries. This general observation is particularly true for research ethics. Little attention has been paid, however, to this internationalization of bioethics in general and research ethics in particular, and there are few studies comparing what has emerged in the different countries.
- Type
- Special Section: Expanding the Boundaries of Bioethics
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997
References
1 Brody, B. Ethics of Research: An International Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
2 The NIH regulations are found in 45 CFR 46 and the FDA in 21 CFR 50. The Federal Common Rule was published in the 18 June 1991 issue of the Federal Register, pp. 28002–32.Google Scholar
3 Medical Research Council of Canada Guidelines on Research Involving Human Subjects. Ottawa: Medical Research Council of Canada, 1987.Google ScholarPubMed
4 European guidance on medical research. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 1990;(56):9–10.Google ScholarPubMed
5 Guidelines in good clinical trials. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 1990;(60):18–23.Google Scholar
6 Foster, CG. Manual for Research Ethics Committees. London: Kings College, 1993.Google Scholar
7 Gromb, S. Le droit de l'experimentation sur l'homme. Paris: Litec, 1992.Google Scholar
8 Graf, HP, Cole, D. Ethics committee authorization in Germany. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;(21): 229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Nordic Council of Medicines. Good Clinical Trial Practice: Nordic Guidelines. Uppsala: Nordic Council on Medicines, 1989.Google Scholar
10. McNeil, P. The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
11. The European and the Australian material is conveniently collected in Animals and their Legal Rights. Washington (DC): Animal Welfare Institute, 1990.Google ScholarPubMed
12. The best source for the complex U.S. laws and regulations is Office for Protection from Research Risks. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook. Washington (DC): National Institutes of Health, 1992.Google Scholar
13. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Public General Acts no. 2 (1990) 1471–1509.Google Scholar
15. Proceed with Caution. Ottawa: Minister of Government Services, 1993.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel. Washington (DC): National Institutes of Health, 1994.Google ScholarPubMed
17. International Digest of Health Legislation 1991:42;60–4.Google Scholar
18. International Digest of Health Legislation 1994:45;479.Google Scholar
19. Research on Fetuses. Oslo: National Committee for Medical Research Ethics, 1990.Google ScholarPubMed
20. A good discussion of the old and the new Victoria legislation is found in New Victoria IVF law changes pioneering legislation. Monash Bioethics Review 1995:14(3):6.Google Scholar
21. Rogers, A, deBousingen, DD. Bioethics in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press, 1995.Google Scholar
22. Westermarck, E. Ethical Relativity. Greenwood Press: 1970 [1932].Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by