Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:27:39.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Request from a Middle Eastern Bride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Loane Skene ,
Jeremy Sugarman ,
Nancy E. Kass ,
Nadine Taub  and
Marion Danis
Loane Skene
Affiliation:
Principal Research Officer for the Victorian Law Reform Commission, Australia
Jeremy Sugarman
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, and Director of the Program in Medical Ethics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Nancy E. Kass
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Nadine Taub
Affiliation:
Law at Rugers University Law School, Newark, New Jersey, where she also directs the Women's Rights Litigation Clinic
Marion Danis
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and Chair of the University of North Carolina Hospital's Ethics Committee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ethics Committees at Work
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 422 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital. 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92, 93 (1914).

2. Schwartz, RL. Autonomy, futility, and the limits of medicine. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1992;1:159–64 at 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. See note 2. Schwartz, . 1992;1:160.Google Scholar

4. In Australia (although the law is different from state to state), abortion is generally lawful only if it is done by a doctor who believes on reasonable grounds that the abortion should be done to prevent a serious risk to the woman's life or physical or mental health; and the abortion is reasonable in the circumstances. Nevertheless, thousands of abortions are performed each year, and many people believe that the legal requirements are sometimes loosely interpreted.