Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:56:59.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Nelson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2007

DAVID WASSERMAN  and
ADRIENNE ASCH
DAVID WASSERMAN
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at the University of Maryland and the Center for Ethics at Yeshiva University, New York
ADRIENNE ASCH
Affiliation:
Wurzweiler School of Social Work and Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, both at Yeshiva University, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are gratified by Nelson's response to our commentary. It shows, for the first time, an appreciation of the distinctive character of our criticism of individual decisions to test and terminate for fetal impairment. Although we still find much to disagree with in Nelson's characterization and critique of our views, he has given us a welcome opportunity to clarify and develop them.

Type
THE GREAT DEBATES
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 478 - 482
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)