Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:43:25.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physician Authority, Family Choice, and the Best Interest of the Child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2022

Alister Browne
Alister Browne*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Langara College, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6M 2J2, Canada
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two of the most poignant decisions in pediatrics concern disagreements between physicians and families over imperiled newborns. When can the family demand more life-sustaining treatment (LST) than physicians want to provide? When can it properly ask for less? The author looks at these questions from the point of view of decision theory, and first argues that insofar as the family acts in the child’s best interest, its choices cannot be constrained, and that the maximax and minimax strategies are equally in the child’s best interest. He then proposes a guideline according to which the family can demand LST if it is physiologically possible to preserve a life the child can be expected to welcome, and refuse such treatment if it causes suffering that is “more than can be borne” even if an uncompromised life is expected to emerge.

Keywords

life-sustaining treatmentdecision theorypediatricsphysician authorityfamily choicebest interest of child
Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 34 - 39
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Bioethics Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Treatment decisions for infants and children. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1986;135:447–8.Google Scholar

2. Mercurio, MR. Parental authority, patient’s best interest and refusal of resuscitation at borderline gestational age. Journal of Perinatology 2008;26:452–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Selections from Opinions of the Judicial Council of the American Medical Association, Dr. John H. Burkhart, Chairman, American Medical Association, Chicago (1982) at 9–10. Cited in President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment, March 1983: Appendix C, at 299.

4. Bioethics Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Treatment decisions regarding infants, children and adolescents. Paediatric Child Health 2004, reaffirmed 2016;9(2):99–103.Google Scholar

5. Verhagen, E, Sauer, PJJ. The Groningen protocol—Euthanasia in severely ill newborns. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352(10):959–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Withholding or Withdrawing Life Sustaining Treatment in Children: A Framework for Practice . 2nd ed. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2004:328–9, at Sec. 3.1.Google Scholar

7. See note 6, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 2004, at 329, Sec. 3.1.

8. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Making Decisions to Limit Treatment in Life-limiting and Life-threatening Conditions in Children: A Framework for Practice. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2015:S13–14, at Sec. 3.1. Larcher, V, Craig, F, Bhogal, K, Wilkinson, D, Brierley, J; Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: A framework for practice. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2015;100(Suppl 2):s1–s26. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. See note 8, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 2015, at S14A.

10. For example, by the Canadian Paediatric Society (see note 1), the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (see notes 6 and 8), and the American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 1994;93:532.

11. Hardwig, J. What about the family? Hastings Center Report 1990;20(2):5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar