Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
As Part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, the Patient Self Determination Act (PSDA) legislates new responsibilites for healthcare facilities. The authors served as members of the California Consortium on Patient Self-Determination, and the materials produced by this group offer healthcare facilities a valuable guide for implementing the PSDA. The ACt follows a historical trend led by doctrines of informed consent and increasing patient autonomy regarding rights to accept or refuse medical treatment and to execute advance directives. The requirements of the Act will influence healthcare facilities and how they communicate with patients about advance directives. Although the Act seeks to increase awareness of advance directices among all participants in healthcare interactions, it could pose major stumbling blocks to providing sensitive and humane care if certain concerns are nor addressed adequatley. The benefits of the Act could be far reaching and substantial for patients and healthcare facilities alike.
1. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 NY, 125, 105 NE 92 (1914).Google Scholar
2. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept of Health, 110 s Ct 2841, (1990).Google Scholar
3. White, ML, Fletcher, JC.The PSDA: on balance, more help than hindrance. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991; 266: 410–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Orentlicher, D.Advance medical directives. Office of the General Counsel. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263: 2367.Google Scholar
5. McCloskey, EL.The Patient Self-Determination Act. Bioethics inside the beltway. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 1991; 1: 165–6. See p. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McCloskey, EL.The Patient Self-Determination Act. Bioethics inside the beltway. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 1991; 1: 165–6. See p. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McCloskey, EL.The Patient Self-Determination Act. Bioethics inside the beltway. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 1991; 1: 165–6. See p. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. McCloskey, EL.The Patient Self-Determination Act. Bioethics inside the beltway. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 1991; 1: 165–6. See p. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. See note 5. McCloskey. 1991; 1: 166.Google Scholar
10. See note 3, White, Fletcher. 1991; 266: 411.Google Scholar
11. Hospital Admitting Monthly 1991: 10 (6): 74.Google Scholar
12. LaPuma, J.Orentlicher, DMoss, R.Advance directives on admission: clinical implications and analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. journal of the American Medical Association 1991; 266: 402–5. See p. 403.Google Scholar
13. Emanuel, LL.Barry, MJStoeckle, JD. et al.Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use. New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 324 889–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 402.Google Scholar
15. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 404.Google Scholar
16. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 405.Google Scholar
17. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 405.Google Scholar
18. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 402.Google Scholar
19. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 404.Google Scholar
20. See Rouse, F.Mrs. Wanglie and “Doctor Knows best” and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1992; 2: 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 403.Google Scholar
22. Cassel, CK.Zweibel, NR.Attitudes regarding life-extending medical care among the elderly and their children Gerntologist 1987; 27 (special issue):229A.Google Scholar
23. See note 12. LaPuma et al. 1991; 266: 402.Google Scholar
24. McCloskey, EL.The Spirit of the PSDA. Practicing the PSDA, Special Supplement, Hastings center Report, 1991; 21 (5): S15.Google Scholar