Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:49:09.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Moral Enhancement from a Habermasian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

HANS-JOERG EHNI  and
DIANA AURENQUE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The human being’s mastery of itself, on which the self is founded, practically always involves the annihilation of the subject in whose service that mastery is maintained, because the substance which is mastered, suppressed, and disintegrated by self-preservation is nothing other than the living entity.

Type
Special Section: Kant, Habermas, and Bioethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 223 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Habermas, J.The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity; 2003Google Scholar (German original: Habermas J. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 2001).

2. For example, Crockett, MJ, Clark, L, Tabibnia, G, Lieberman, MD, Robbins, TW.Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science 2008;320:1739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Crockett, MJ.The neurochemistry of fairness: Clarifying the link between serotonin and prosocial behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009;1167:76–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and Crockett, MJ, Clark, L, Hauser, MD, Robbins, TW.Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107:17433–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Douglas, T.Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008;25:228–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. See note 3, Douglas 2008, at 229.

5. Miller, S, Selgelid, MJ.Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 2007;13:523–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Persson, I, Savulescu, J.Moral transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2010;35:656–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Wilson, EO.On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA [u.a.]: Harvard University Press; 2004.Google Scholar

8. Watson, L.Dark Nature. New York: Harper Collins; 1995.Google Scholar

9. See note 6, Persson, Savulescu 2010, at 667.

10. Habermas, J, Shapiro, JJ.Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press; 1971.Google Scholar

11. See, e.g., Ingram, D.Habermas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2010, at 44.Google Scholar

12. Habermas, J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990Google Scholar, at 44 (German original: Habermas J. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1983, at 54).

13. See, e.g., Brunkhorst, H, Kreide, R, Lafont, C, Habermas, J.Habermas-Handbuch. Stuttgart [u.a.]: Metzler; 2009, at 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 44 (Habermas 1983, at 54).

15. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 58 (Habermas 1983, at 68).

16. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 58 (Habermas 1983, at 68).

17. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 60 (Habermas 1983, at 70).

18. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 58 (Habermas 1983, at 68).

19. See note 1, Habermas 2003.

20. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 57 (Habermas 1983, at 67).

21. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 49 (Habermas 1983, at 59).

22. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 49 (Habermas 1983, at 59).

23. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 89.

24. See note 12, Habermas 1990, at 66–7 (Habermas 1983, at 77).

25. Habermas, J.Europe: The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity; 2009Google Scholar, at 139 (German original: Habermas J. Ach Europa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 2008, at 140).

26. See note 25, Habermas 2009, at 136 (Habermas 2008, at 136).

27. See note 25, Habermas 2009, at 136 (Habermas 2008, at 136).

28. Sandel, MJ.The Case against Perfection. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2007, at 31.Google Scholar

29. Harris, J.Enhancing Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007, at 129–32.Google Scholar

30. Horkheimer, M, Adorno, TW. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2002Google Scholar, at 43.

31. Habermas, J, MacCarthy, T.The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: Lifeword and System. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1987Google Scholar, at 356–73 (German original: Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2: Zur Kritik der Funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1981, at 470–85).

32. See note 31, Habermas 1987, at 142 (Habermas 1981, at 212).

33. See note 31, at 355 (Habermas 1981, at 470).

34. See note 1, Habermas 2003, at 44–53 (Habermas 2001, at 80–92).