Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:22:49.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living Versus Dying “With Dignity”: A New Perspective on the Euthanasia Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Tom Koch
Tom Koch
Affiliation:
writer and researcher in the fields of on-line information and gerontology, and Forum Associate at the David-See-Chai Lam Centre for International Communications, Simon Fraser University, Harbour Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has been no informed or honest debate in North America over the issue of liberalized euthanasia. Despite thousands of newspaper stories, scores of learned academic articles, a handful of closely analyzed legal decisions, and hours of broadcast news and talk show imagery, a full discussion is yet to begin.

Type
Special Section: Physician-Aided Death: The Escalating Debate
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 50 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Rodriguez v. British Columbia. SCJ No. 94 (1993) File 23,476 [Head notes].

2. See note 1. Rodriguez v British Columbia. 1993:40.

3. Young, JM, Marshall, CL, Anderson, EJ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients' perspectives on use of mechanical ventilation. Health and Social Work 1994; 19:255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Mullens, A. No right or wrong way to die. Toronto Star 1995; 10 22:D5.Google Scholar

5. Somerville, M. The song of death: the lyrics of euthanasia. Journal of Contemporary Health, Law, and Policy 1993:9.Google ScholarPubMed

6. Vienneau, D. Rodriguez still deciding what next move will be. Toronto Start 1993; 10 1:A3. “I am being treated for pain so I don't feel physical pain.”Google Scholar

7. Brock, D. Voluntary active euthanasia. Hastings Center Report 1992;22:11.Google ScholarPubMed See also Young, JM. Hastings Center Report 1992;22:254.Google Scholar

8. Marker, RL. “Doctor death” finds a mouthpiece. The Human Life Review 1994;22:54–5.Google Scholar

9. Miller, PS. The impact of assisted suicide on persons with disabilities – is it a right without freedom? Issues in Law & Medicine 1993;9:47–62.Google ScholarPubMed

10. Hawking, S. Black holes and baby universes and other essays. New York: Bantam, 1993:167.Google Scholar

11. Bindman, S. Judge stays on bench to fight his disease's “death sentence.” Toronto Star 1993; 01 11:A1.11.Google Scholar

12. See note 7. Young, . 1992;22:254.Google Scholar

13. See note 11. Bindman, . 1993; January 11:A1.11.Google Scholar

14. Nuwer, H. A place for gifted children. CompuServe Magazine 1994; November:46.Google Scholar

15. See note 1. Rodriguez v British Columbia. 1993.

16. See note 1, Rodriguez v British Columbia. 1993:6.Google Scholar

17. See note 9. Miller, . 1993;9:47–62.Google Scholar

18. Koch, T. Watersheds: stories of crises and renewal in our every day life. Toronto: Lester Publishing, Ltd., 1994.Google Scholar

19. Monsebraaten, L. Disabled funding bid rejected. Toronto Star 1994; 12 9:A14.Google Scholar

20. Coutts, J. Parents of disabled denied more funds. Globe and Mail 1994; 12 9:A13.Google Scholar

21. Transcript summary of prosecution against Boudewijn Chabot. Docket No. 478–1993. September 16, 1993.

22. See note 9. Miller, . 1993;9:60.Google Scholar

23. “The Kevorkian cure: death.” NY Times 1990; 12 9:§4, at 16. [Quoted by Miller, see note 9].Google Scholar

24. Associated Press. Dutch woman's aided death rekindles euthanasia debate. Toronto Star 1994; June 23: A19.Google Scholar

25. See note 24. AP. 1994; June 23:A19.

26. Van Leeuwen, E, Kimsma, GK. Acting or letting go: medical decision making in neonatology in The Netherlands. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993;2:265–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

27. Kemp, EJ Jr. Paternalism, disability, and the right to die. Issues in Law & Medicine 1993;9:76.Google Scholar

28. Dutch issue guidelines on handicapped babies. British Medical Journal 1992;305:1312.Google Scholar

29. “Commission on the study of medical practice concerning euthanasia. Medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Hague: SdU, 1991; See also van der Maas, PJ, van Dieden, JJM, Pineborg, L. Medical decisions concerning the end of life. Health Policy 1992; Suppl.Google Scholar

30. Koch, T. A place in time: care givers for the elderly. New York: Praeger Books, 1993. See, for example, Chap. 2.Google Scholar

31. Dutch doctors support life termination. British Medical Journal 1993;306:22.Google Scholar

32. Polls B. Kwartz aids-patient sterft door euthanasie. NRC Handelsblad 1991; 06 18:3.Google Scholar See also Euthanasie bij groot deel van terminale aidspatieten. NRC Handelsblad 1993; 06 10:9. Public summaries of International Aids Conference Reports.Google Scholar

33. Horn, M. Grief re-examined. US News & World Report. 1993; 06 14:81–4.Google ScholarDrNeugebauer's, Richard study appeared in the American Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar

34. Kübler-Ross, E. Living with death and dying. New York: Collier Books, 1981.Google Scholar

35. See note 1. Rodriguez v British Columbia. 1993:56.Google Scholar

36. Buck v Bell. 274 US 200,207 (1927).

37. Marker, RL. Doctor death finds a mouthpiece. The Human Life Review 1994;21:59.Google Scholar