Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:29:02.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limiting But Not Abandoning Treatment in Severely Mentally Impaired Patients: A Troubling Issue for Ethics Consultants and Ethics Committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Erich H. Loewy
Erich H. Loewy
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria and Associate Professor of Humanities (Ethics) at the University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On many occasions, care givers are faced with problems in which “drastic” types of treatment seem clearly inappropriate but “lesser” interventions still appear to be advisable, if not indeed mandatory. In the hospital setting, examples are frequent: the demented elderly patient, still very much capable of brief social interactions and still able to enjoy at least limited life, who although clearly not a candidate for coronary bypass surgery is, nevertheless, a patient in whom an intercurrent pneumonia deserves treatment; the severely retarded youngster in whom appendectomy seems clearly warranted but for whom long-term dialysis seems ill-advised. The examples are legion, and their variety defies an easy, stereotypical solution. Why, one may ask, is the treatment of intercurrent pneumonia or operating on an acute appendix “clearly indicated” while coronary bypass and long-term dialysis “clearly” are not? The reactions of care givers in the past have often consisted of attempts to give half-hearted treatment or to treat fully even against their better judgment. The lack of conceptual guidelines that might help sort out such problems has inevitably led either to an inflexible absolutism in which all possible treatment to sustain life or no treatment at all is given or has resulted in a pathetic attempt to act but act minimally (the “slow code” or to give what seems to be an ineffective dose of antimicrobials) with the hope that such actions will be ineffective.

Type
Special Section: Ethical Decision Making and Persons with Mental Retardation
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 216 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Hilfiker, D. Allowing the debilitated to die: facing our ethical choices. New England Journal of Medicine 1983;308:716–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Loewy, EH. Suffering as a consideration in ethical decision making. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1992;1:135–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Loewy, EH. Treatment decisions in the mentally impaired: limiting but not abandoning treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 1987;317:1465–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Amundsen, DW. The physician's obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Center Report 1978;8(4):23–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. Loewy, EH. Friendship in Medicine (In preparation)Google Scholar

6. Meisel, A. Legal myths about terminating life support. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151: 1497–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Mccloskey, EL. Hopes for the PSDA. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1991;2(3): 172–3.Google ScholarPubMed

8. Loewy, EH. Advance directives: a question of patient autonomy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1994;3(3):in press.Google Scholar

9. Loewy, EH. Advance directives and surrogate laws: ethical instruments or moral cop-out? Archives of Internal Medicine 1992;152:1973–1976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Kushner, T. Having a life versus being alive. Journal of Medical Ethics 1984;1:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Rachels, J. The End of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

12. Wanzer, SH, Adelstein, SJ, Cranford, RE. The physician's responsibility towards hopelessly illpatients. New England Journal of Medicine 1984;310:955–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Churchill, LR, Simán, JJ. Principles and the search for moral certitude. Social Science and Medicine 1986;23:461–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Toulmin, S. The tyranny of principles. Hastings Center Report 1984;14(5):35–7.Google Scholar

15. Loewy, EH. Drunks, livers and values. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 1987;9:436–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16. See note 3. Loewy, . 1987;317:1465–9.Google Scholar

17. Sass, HM, Kielstein, R. Die Wertanamnese. Bochum, Germany: Zentrum fur Med Ethik, 1992.Google ScholarEmanul, EJ, Emanuel, LL. Living wills: past, present and future. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1991;1:9–19.Google Scholar

18. Pariser, JJ. Comfort measures only for DNR orders. Connecticut Medicine 1982;46(4): 195–9.Google Scholar

19. See note 3. Loewy, . 1987;317:1465–9.Google Scholar

20. Pellegrino, ED, Thomasma, DC. For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

21. Nozick, R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google ScholarEngelhardt, HT. The Foundatior of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

22. Loewy, EH. Freedom and Community: The Ethics of Interdependence. Albany, New York: SUNY Press 1993.Google Scholar

23. Dewey, J. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt & Co, 1938.Google Scholar

24. Engelhardt, HT. Bioethics in a pluralist society. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1982;26:64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Fleck, L. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Basel: Beno Schwabe, 1935Google Scholar

26. See note 24. Engelhardt, . 1982;26:64–78.Google Scholar

27. See note 21. Engelhardt, . 1986.Google Scholar

28. Engelhardt, HT. Bioethics and Secular Humanism. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1991Google Scholar

29. See note 22. Loewy, . 1993.Google Scholar

30. Rousseau, JJ. Discours sur L'Origine et les Fondaments de I'Inéqualité parmi les Hommes. Paris: Gallimarc 1965.Google ScholarSchopenhauer, A. Preisschrift über die Grundlage der Moral. In: Arthur Schopenhauer, Samtlich Werke, Band III. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

31. See note 22. Loewy, . 1993.Google Scholar

32. See note 2. Loewy, . 1992;1:135–42.Google Scholar