Article contents
Judging Medical Futility: An Ethical Analysis of Medical Power and Responsibility
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
In situations where experience shows that a particular intervention will not benefit a patient, common sense seems to suggest that the intervention should not be used. Yet it is precisely in these situations that a peculiar ethic begins to operate, an ethic that Eddy calls “the criterion of potential benefit.” According to this ethic, “a treatment is appropriate if it might have some benefit.” Thus, the various maxims learned in medical school instruct physicians that “‘an error of commission is to be preferred to an error of omission,’ or ‘when in doubt, cut it out’ or ‘if but one patient is helped, then the treatment is worthwhile.’”
- Type
- Special Section: Beyond Autonomy
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1. Eddy, DM. Medicine, money and mathematics. American College of Surgeons Bulletin 1992;77:36–49 (at 42).Google ScholarPubMed
2. See note 1. Eddy, . 1992:42.Google Scholar
3. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Decisions near the end of life. Journal of the American Medical Association 1992;67:2229–33.Google Scholar
4. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983:44.Google Scholar
5. Society of Critical Care Medicine, Task Force on Ethics. Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Critical Care Medicine 1990;18:1435–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hastings Center. Guidelines on the Termination of Life-sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
7. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991;265:1868–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. American Heart Association, Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees. Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, VII: ethical considerations in resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1992;268:2282–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. American Thoracic Society, Bioethics Task Force. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991;115:478–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS. Is the treatment beneficial, experimental or futile? submitted.Google Scholar
11. Tomlinson, T, Brody, H. Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990;264:1276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions. New England Journal of Medicine 1986;315:1347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Paris, JJ, Reardon, FE. Physician refusal of requests for futile or ineffective interventions. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1992;2:127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Paris, JJ, Schreiber, MD, Statter, M, Arensman, R, Siegler, M. Beyond autonomy: physicians' refusal to use life-prolonging extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329:354–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Faber-Langendoen, K. Resuscitation of patients with metastatic cancer: is transient benefit still futile? Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151:235–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS, Jonsen, AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991;112:949–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS. The Wrong Medicine: The Pursuit of Futile Treatment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (in press).Google Scholar
18. See note 10. Schneiderman, Jecker. Submitted.
19. Grimes, DA. Technology follies. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993;269:3030–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Schoenbaum, SC. Towards fewer procedures and better outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993;269:794–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Chalmers, TC. Ethical aspects of clinical trials. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1975;79:753–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Jecker, NS, Schneiderman, LJ. Futility and rationing. American Journal of Medicine 1992;92:189–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984:1213.Google Scholar
24. See note 23. Oxford English Dictionary. 1984:1213.Google Scholar
25. See note 23. Oxford English Dictionary. 1984:1213–4.Google Scholar
26. See note 23. Oxford English Dictionary. 1984:1213.Google Scholar
27. See note 23. Oxford English Dictionary. 1984:1214.Google Scholar
28. Merchant, C. The Death of Nature. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers, 1980:193.Google Scholar
29. Benn, SI. Power. In: Edwards, P, ed. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 5. New York: Macmillan, 1972:424–7.Google Scholar
30. Osmond, H, Siegler, M. The sick role and Aesculapian authority. Alabama Journal of Medical Sciences 1980;17:197–201.Google ScholarPubMed
31. See note 23. Oxford English Dictionary. 1984:2121.Google Scholar
32. Weber, M. The social psychology of the world religions. In: Gerth, HH, Mills, CW. Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946:267–301.Google Scholar
33. Osmond, H. God and the doctor. New England Journal of Medicine 1980;302:555–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Midgley, M. Science and Salvation. New York: Routledge, 1992:2.Google Scholar
35. See note 34. Midgley, . 1992:7.Google Scholar
36. Moser, HW. Lorenzo's oil. Lancet 1993;341:544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Aubourg, P, Adamsbaum, C, Lavallard-Rousseau, M Claude et al. , A two-year trial of oleic and erucic acids (‘Lorenzo's oil’) as treatment for adrenomyeloneuropathy. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329:745–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Rizzo, WB. Lorenzo's oil: hope and disappointment. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329:801–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Wong, V. Adrenoleukodystrophy in a Chinese boy. Brain Development 1992;14:276–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. See note 36. Moser, . 1993:544.Google Scholar
41. Zinkham, WH, Kickler, T, Borel, J, Moser, HW. Lorenzo's oil and thrombocytopenia in patients with adrenoleukodystrophy. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;328:1126–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Unkrig, CJ, Schroder, R, Scharf, RE. Lorenzo's oil and lymphocytopenia [Letter]. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;330:577.Google Scholar
43. Chai, BC, Siminoski, K. Thrombocytopenia associated with use of Lorenzo's oil [Letter]. American Journal of Hematology 1993;44:290–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. See note 37. Aubourg, et al. 1993.Google Scholar
45. Brody, H. The Healer's Power. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992:21.Google Scholar
46. Jecker, NS. Knowing when to stop. Hastings Center Report 1991;21:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Ladd, J. Physicians and society: tribulations of power and responsibility. In: Spicker, SF, Healexy, JM, Engelhardt, HT, eds. The Law-Medicine Relation: A Philosophical Exploration. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981:33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Flatham, RE. Power, authority, and rights in the practice of medicine. In: Agich, GJ, ed. Responsibility in Health Care. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1982:105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. McShea, RJ. How power corrupts. Journal of Value Inquiry 1978;12:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punishment. New York: Random House, 1979.Google Scholar
51. ten Have, H. How futility saved the live [sic] of medicine. European Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care 1993;1:30–3.Google Scholar
52. Wolf, S. Conflict between doctor and patient. Law, Medicine and Health Care 1988;16:197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Wolf, S. Near death—in the moment of decision. New England Journal of Medicine 1990;322:208–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Veatch, RM, Spicer, CM. Medically futile care: the role of the physician in setting limits. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1992;18:15–36.Google ScholarPubMed
55. Ackerman, F. The significance of a wish. Hastings Center Report 1991;21:27–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Angell, M. The case of Helga Wanglie. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;325:511–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. See note 56. Angell, . 1991:512.Google Scholar
58. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Third Edition.New York: Oxford University Press, 1989:72.Google Scholar
59. See note 17. Schneiderman, Jecker. In press.
60. Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS. Futility in practice. Archives of Internal Medicine 1993;153:437–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Lundberg, GD. American health care system management objectives: the aura of inevitability becomes incarnate. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993;269:2554–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62. Stell, LK. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Saint Louis University Public Law Review 1992;11:481–97.Google ScholarPubMed
63. Veatch, RM. Contemporary bioethics and the demise of modern medicine. In: Ormiston, GL, Sassower, R, eds. Prescriptions: The Dissemination of Medical Authority. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990:23–40.Google Scholar
64. Reiser, SJ, Dyck, AJ, Curran, WJ. Selections from the Hippocratic corpus. In: Reiser, S, Dyck, AJ, Curran, WJ, eds. Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985:5–10.Google Scholar
65. Jecker, NS, Pearlman, RA. Medical futility: who decides? Archives of Internal Medicine 1992;152:1140–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Jecker, NS, Pearlman, RA. Medical futility [Letter]. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992;152:2505–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. See note 60. Schneiderman, Jecker. 1993;153:437–41.Google Scholar
68. Hackler, JC, Hiller, C. Family consent to orders not to resuscitate. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990;264:1281–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69. See note 68. Hackler, Hiller. 1990:1282.Google Scholar
70. See note 68. Hackler, Hiller. 1990:1283.Google Scholar
71. Wanzer, SH, Adelstein, J, Cranford, RE et al. , The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. New England Journal of Medicine 1984;310:955–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Schneiderman, LJ, Faber-Langendoen, K, Jecker, NS. Beyond futility to an ethic of care. American Journal of Medicine 1994;96:110–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. See note 30. Osmond, Siegler. 1980:199.Google Scholar
74. Koch, KA, Meyers, BW, Sandroni, S. Analysis of power in medical decision-making: an argument for physician autonomy. Law Medicine and Health Care 1992;20:320–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. See note 47. Ladd, . 1981.Google Scholar
76. See note 54. Veatch, Spicer. 1992:27.Google Scholar
77. Baier, A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 1986;96:231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Foucault, M. The Birth of the Clinic. New York: Vintage Books, 1975:84.Google Scholar
79. Maclntyre, A, quoted in Hauerwas, SM. Authority and the profession of medicine. In: Agich, GJ, ed. Responsibility in Health Care. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1982:83–104.Google Scholar
80. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968:xi.Google Scholar
81. Parsons, T. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: The Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar
82. Hiley, DR. Power and values in corporate life. Journal of Business Ethics 1987;6:343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Jecker, NS, Schneiderman, LJ. Medical futility: the duty not to treat. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993;2:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by