Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:38:38.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Vitro Fertilization: Regulations in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Urban Wiesing
Affiliation:
Wilhelms-Universitat, Munster, Germany

Extract

In Germany — as probably worldwide — in vitro fertilization (IVF) has provoked disapproval, fears, and dread, but it also raises hope and gives feelings of pride and satisfaction in a new scientific achievement. Critics look for convincing argu- ments that could ban IVF completely or at least restrict it considerably. Some of the most important arguments are outlined below.

The main aspect of IVF that was new to society was that conception could take place outside the female body. Although this fact has made a deep impression on us, no ethical relevance has been attributed to it. One must look further for arguments against IVF.

Type
Special Section: From Cells to Selves: Ethics at the Beginning of Life
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Bundeeärztekammer, ed. Weissbuch. Anfang und Ende menschlichen Lebens — Medizinischer Fortschritt und Ärztliche Ethik. Köln: Deutscher Arzte-Verlag, 1988. Note especially that the decision concerning IVF restriction to married couples is discussed controversially.Google Scholar

2. Kongregation für die Glaubenslehre. Instruction über die Achtung vor dem beginnenden menschlichen Leben und die Würde der Fortpflanzung. Cited in: Wehowsky, S, ed. Lebensbeginn und menschliche Wiirde. Frankfurt Munchen, Campus, 1987:331.Google Scholar

3. Stauber, M. Psychosomatische Befunde bei Sterilität. In: Frick-Bruder, V, Platz, P, eds. Psychosomatische Probleme in der Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe. Berlin: Springer, 1984:139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Walters, L. Ethics and the new reproductive technologies: an international review of committee statements. Hastings Center Report 1987;17(Special Suppl.):38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. Bayertz, K. GenEthik. Probleme der Technisierung menschlicher Fortpflanzung. Reinbeck: Rowohlt, 1987.Google Scholar

6. Edelstein, L. In: Tomkin, O, Tomkin, CL, eds. Ancient Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967:6.Google Scholar

7. Medical Research International, Soo. f. Assisted Repro. Tech., The American Fertility Society. In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1989 results from the IVF-ET Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1991;55:1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. Templeton, AA, Penney, GC. The incidence, characteristics, and prognosis of patients whose infertility is unexplained. Fertility and Sterility 1982;37:175182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. Abyholm, T, Stray-Pedersen, S. A follow-up study among 285 men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. International Journal of Andrology 1981;4:421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Collins, JA, Wrixon, W, Janes, LB, et al. Treatment-independent pregnancy among infertile couples. New England Journal of Medicine 1983;309:1201–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedRoh, SI, Awadalla, SG, Friedman, CI, et al. In vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer: treatment-dependent versus -independent pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility 1987;48:982–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Wagner, MG, Clair, PASt. Are in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer of benefit to all? The Lancet 1000(10Oct. 28);1027–30.Google Scholar

12. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983:341.Google ScholarPubMed

13. Soules, MR. The in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate: let's be honest with one another. Fertility and Sterility 1986;43:511–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin. Embryonen-Forschung zulaeen eder verbieten? Ethik in der Medizin 1000;2:107–15.Google Scholar