Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:27:11.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Can Empirical Ethics Improve Medical Practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

REIDUN FØRDE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Empirical Ethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 517 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Musschenga, AW.Empirical ethics, context sensitivity and contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005;30:1–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Agich, GJ.Understanding criticisms of clinical ethics and ethics consultation. Formosan Journal Medical Humanities 2009;10:3–15.Google Scholar

2. Sulmasy, DP, Sugarman, J. The many methods of medical ethics. In: Sugarman, J, Sulmasy, DP, eds. Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:3–18.Google Scholar

3. Portz, R.EACME Newsletter 2010;24, at 2.Google Scholar

4. Reiter-Theil, S.What does empirical research contribute to medical ethics? A methodological discussion using exemplary studies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2012;21(4):425–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. Molewijk, B, Stillegbout, AM, Otten, W, Dupuis, HM, Kievit, J.Empirical data and moral theory: A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2004;7:55–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Borry, P, Schotsmans, P, Dierickx, K.What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2004;7:41–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Solbakk, JH.Use and abuse of empirical knowledge in contemporary bioethics. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2004;7:5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. See note 5, Borry et al. 2004; van der Scheer, L, Widdershoven, G.Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity? Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2004;1:89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Reiter-Theil, S.Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2004;7:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. See note 8, Reiter-Theil 2004.

10. Candy, B, Sampson, EL, Jones, L.Enteral tube feeding in older people with advanced dementia: Findings from a Cochrane systematic review. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2009;15(8):396–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Lanuke, K, Faisinger, RL, Demoissac, D.Hydration management at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2004;7:257–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Raijmakers, NJ, van Zuylen, L, Constantini, M, Caraceni, A, Lundquist, G, Voltz, R, et al. . Artificial nutrition and hydration in the last week of life in cancer patients: A systematic literature review of practices and effects. Annals of Oncology 2011; available athttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21199887 (last accessed 11 Jan 2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. See note 1, Musschenga 2005.

13. See note 1, Musschenga 2005.

14. Agledahl, KM, Førde, R, Wifstad, A.Choice is not the issue: The misrepresentation of health care in bioethical discourse. Journal of Medical Ethics 2011;37:212–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Dreyer, A, Førde, R, Nortvedt, P.Ethical decision-making in nursing homes: Influence of organisational factors. Nursing Ethics 2011;18:514–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Dreyer, A, Førde, R, Nortvedt, P.Life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes: How do physicians and nurses describe and justify their own practice? Journal of Medical Ethics 2010;36:396–400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Gjerberg, E, Førde, R, Pedersen, R, Bollig, G.Ethical challenges in the provision of end of life care in Norwegian nursing homes. Social Science and Medicine 2010;71:677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

17. Sommer, I, Pedersen, R, Høie, AGE, Nortvedt, P.Retningslinjer for forhåndsvurdering av å avstå fra hjerte-lunge-redning (Guidelines for assessing DNR code). Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association) 2007;127:1368–9.Google Scholar

18. Førde, IS, Berner, M, Pedersen, R, Førde, R.Manglende oversikt over etiske retningslinjer (Lack of overview of ethical guidelines). Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association) 2007;127:1394–6.Google Scholar

19. Van der Maas, PJ, van der Wal, G, de Graff, CLM, Kester, JGC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, BD, van der Heide, A, et al. . Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335:1700–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

20. Kälvemark, S, Höglund, AT, Hansson, MG, Westerholm, P, Arnetz, B.Living with conflicts—ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Social Science and Medicine 2004;58:1075–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

21. Førde, R, Aasland, OG.Moral distress among Norwegian doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:521–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

22. Tønnesen, S, Førde, R, Nortvedt, P.Fair nursing care when resources are limited: The role of patients and family members in Norwegian nursing homes. Policy, Politics and Nursing Practice 2009;4(10):276–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Norwegian Patients’ Rights Act 1999, Chapter 4.A (new as of 1 Jan 2009).

24. Hem MH, Gjerberg E, Pedersen R, Førde R. Pleie og omsorg i grenselandet mellom frivillighet og tvang: Pleiepersonells erfaringer med å hjelpe personer med demens i personlig stell (Nursing care between voluntariness and coercion: Nursing staff’s experiences with helping persons with dementia). Sykepleien Forskning (Nursing Science) 2010;5:294–301.

25. See note 24, Hem et al. 2010.

26. See note 16, Gjerberg et al. 2010.

27. Winkler, E, Reiter-Theil, S, Lange-Rieß, D, Schmahl-Menges, N, Hiddemann, W.Patient involvement in decisions to limit treatment: The crucial role of agreement between physician and patient. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27(13):2225–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28. Hurst, SA, Hull, SC, Danis, M.How physicians face ethical difficulties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:7–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

29. See note 21, Førde, Aasland 2008; Aasland, OG, Førde, R.Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: The importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2005;14:13–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

30. Førde, R, Pedersen, R, Akre, R.Clinicians’ evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: A qualitative study. Journal of Philosophy and Health Care 2008;11:17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

31. See note 29, Aasland, Førde 2005.

32. Allsop, J, Mulcahy, L.Maintaining professional identity: Doctors’ responses to complaints. Sociology, Health and Illness 1998;20:801–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Van Kesteren, RG, Velthuis, B, Leyden, LW.Psychological problems arising from home ventilation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;80:439–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mah, JK, Thannhauser, JE, McNeil, DA, Dewey, D.Being the lifeline: The parent experience of caring for a child with neuromuscular disease on home mechanical ventilation. Neuromuscular Disorders 2008;18:983–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

34. Hurst, SA, Perrier, A, Pegoraro, R, Reiter-Theil, S, Førde, R, Slowther, AM, et al. . Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: Experience of European doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:51–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see note 20, Kälvemark 2004.

35. Glasberg AL. Stress of conscience and burnout in healthcare. The danger of deadening one’s conscience. Umeå: Umeå University Medical Dissertations; 2007.

36. Reiter-Theil, S, Agich, GJ.Research on clinical ethics and consultation: Introduction to the theme. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2008;11:3–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Pfaefflin, M, Kobert, K, Reiter-Theil, S.Evaluating clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2009;18(4):406–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Pedersen, R, Akre, V, Førde, R.What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. Journal of Medical Ethics 2009;35:147–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Pedersen, R, Akre, V, Førde, R.Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: The experiences of nine clinical ethics committees. Bioethics 2009 Oct;23(8):460–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

38. Førde, R, Pedersen, R.Clinical ethics committees in Norway: What do they do, and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011;20:389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. Halvorsen, K, Førde, R, Nortvedt, P.Value choices and considerations when limiting intensive care treatment: A qualitative study. Acta Anaestesiologica Scandinavica 2009;53:10–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Sørlie, V, Førde, R, Lindseth, A, Norberg, A.Male physicians’ narratives about being in ethically difficult care situations in pediatrics. Social Science & Medicine 2001;53:657–67.Google Scholar

40. Førde, R, Vandvik, IH.Clinical ethics, information, and communication: Review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:73–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

41. Pedersen, R, Førde, R. Fuzzy law encountering life, death, and morality—A report on nine clinical ethics committees’ legal considerations. In: Grunnin, J, Holm, S, Kerway, I, eds. Ethics, Law & Society. Surrey: Ashgate; 2009:149–63.Google Scholar