Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:19:26.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Euthanasia in The Netherlands: The Role of the Dutch Medical Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

R.J.M. Dillmann
R.J.M. Dillmann
Affiliation:
Secretary of Medical Affairs, Royal Dutch Medical Association and a member of the Faculty of Medicine, Free University of Amsterdam.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Is it remarkable that the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) as a medical professional organization has the point of view that in particular circumstances euthanasia is an acceptable act for a physician. Seen from the viewpoints in the international (medical) community, we might say that it is highly remarkable. Frankly put: the RDMA has met strong international disapproval of its standpoint on euthanasia during the last 10 years or so. For instance, the World Medical Association still condemns physicians performing euthanasia as “unethical.” So far the RDMA is the only professional medical organization that holds the view that in particular cases euthanasia is morally acceptable. However, viewed within the context of Dutch society, the Dutch system of healthcare, and the sociocultural approach to moral questions in The Netherlands, the RDMA point of view ceases to be reprehensible.

Type
Special Section: Physician-Aided Death: The Escalating Debate
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Winter 1996 , pp. 100 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Van der Wal, G, Dillmann, RJM. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. British Medical Journal 1994;308:1346–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Van der Wal, G. Euthanasia and assisted suicide by family doctors [Dissertation, in Dutch, with an English summary]. Rotterdam: WYT Uitgeefgroep, 1992.Google Scholar

3. Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Health Policy 1992 (Suppl).Google Scholar

4. KNMG. Medische ethiek en gedragsleer. Amsterdam, 1959:14–15.Google Scholar

5. Gezondheidsraad, . Interimadvies Commissie Medische Ethiek Gezondheidsraad. Den Haag, 1972.Google Scholar

6. Dillmann, RJM, Legemaate, J. Euthanasia in The Netherlands: state of the legal debate. European journal of Health in Law 1994;1:81–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Van der Burg, W. The slippery slope argument. Ethics 1991;102:42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Van der Wal, G. Euthanasia out of Penal Code, but no bureaucracy around dying [In Dutch]. Nederlands Juristen Blad 1993;444:9.Google Scholar

9. Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM, Looman, CWN, Life-terminating acts without explicit request of patient. The Lancet 1993;341:1196–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. KNMG. Schriftelijke wilsbeschikkingen. Utrecht: E.B. van Veen, 1993.Google Scholar

11. Dillmann, RJM, Kastelein, WR. KNMG consult. Schriftelijke wilsverklaringen. Utrecht, 1994.Google Scholar