Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:22:18.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Our Moral Judgments Need to Be Guided by Principles?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

ROBERTO ANDORNO
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Empirical Ethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 457 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Chekhov, A.Selected Stories. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth; 1996:16–24.Google Scholar

2. Musschenga, A.Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity and contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005;30(5):467–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. See Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd ed.New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar In later editions of this work, the authors have made significant efforts to incorporate the criticisms to their principlist approach.

4. Pellegrino, E.The metamorphosis of medical ethics: A 30 years perspective. JAMA 1993;269:1158–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also, among many others, Clouser, KD, Gert, B.A critique of principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1990;15:219–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; ten Have, H.The hyperreality of clinical ethics: A unitary theory and hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine 1994;15:113–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. See Andorno, R. Anti-theory. In: Chadwick, R, ten Have, H, Meslin, E, eds. Sage Handbook of Health Care Ethics. London: Sage; 2011:31–8.Google Scholar

6. Anscombe, E.Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 1958;33:1–19. Reprinted in: Crisp R, Slote M, eds. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997:26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Stocker, M.The schizophrenia of modern ethical theory. Journal of Philosophy 1976;73(14):453–66. Reprinted in Crisp R, Slote M, eds. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997:66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. MacIntyre, A.After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1984, at 54–5.Google Scholar

9. Beiner, R. Do we need a philosophical ethics? In: Bartlett, R, Collins, S, eds. Action and Contemplation: Studies in the Moral and Philosophical Thought of Aristotle. New York: State University of New York Press; 1999:37–52, at 43.Google Scholar

10. See Nussbaum, M. Bernard, Williams: Tragedies, hope, justice. In: Calcut, D, ed. Reading Bernard Williams. New York: Routledge; 2009, at 213.Google Scholar

11. Williams, B.Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press; 1985.Google Scholar

12. See note 11, Williams 1985, at 72.

13. See note 11, Williams 1985, at 78–92.

14. Jonsen, A, Toulmin, S.The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1988.Google Scholar

15. See Dworkin, G. Theory and practice of moral reasoning. In: Copp, D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:624–44.Google Scholar

16. Dancy, J.Ethics Without Principles. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Gauch, H.Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004, at 221.Google Scholar

18. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics (transl. by ES Forster and H Tredennick). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1960:II.19.

19. See Welch, J. Cleansing the doors of perception: Aristotle on induction. In: Boudouris, K, ed. Greek Philosophy and Epistemology. Vol. II. Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy; 2001:204–13.Google Scholar

20. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (transl. by H Rackham). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982:VI.3.3.

21. Aristotle, On the Soul (transl. by WS Hett). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1975:III,8,432a.

22. The axiom “nihil est in intellectu . . .” can be literally found in Thomas Aquinas’s writings. See, e.g., Quaestiones disputatae De veritate. In Opera Omnia (Leonine edition), Vol. 22. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso;l976: q. 2, a. 3, arg. 19.

23. Locke, J, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Book II. New York: Prometheus Books; 1995.Google Scholar

24. Smith, R. Aristotle’s logic. In: Zalta, EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2009 Spring; available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic (last accessed 14 Dec 2010).Google Scholar

25. Groarke, L.An Aristotelian Account of Induction: Creating Something from Nothing. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2009, at 331.Google Scholar

26. MacIntyre, A. First principles, final ends and contemporary philosophical issues. In: Knight, K, ed. The MacIntyre Reader. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1998, at 171.Google Scholar

27. Hare, RM.The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1961, at 39.Google Scholar

28. See note 9, Beiner 1999, at 43.

29. See Beauchamp, T. Universal principles and universal rights. In: den Exter, A, ed. Biomedicine and Human Rights. Antwerpen: Makku; 2010:49–66. Beauchamp T. A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003;13(3):259–74.Google Scholar

30. See note 20, Aristotle, VI.13.5

31. See note 26, MacIntyre 1998, at 189.

32. See note 20, Aristotle, I.3.4.

33. Louden, R. Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992, at 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. See, for instance, Widdershoven, G, Abma, T. Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory. In: Ashcroft, R, Dawson, A, Draper, H, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: Wiley; 2007:215–21Google Scholar; Steinkamp, N, Gordijn, B.Ethical case deliberation on the ward: A comparison of four methods. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2003;6(3):235–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Molewijk, B, van Zadelhoff, E, Lendemeijer, B, Widdershoven, G.Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care; improving moral competency of professionals and the quality of care. Bioethica Forum. Swiss Journal of Biomedical Ethics 2008;1(1):57–65.Google Scholar

35. Saunders, B.How to teach moral theories in applied ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2010(10);36:635–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

36. Maxwell, B, Racine, E.Should empathic development be a priority in biomedical ethics teaching? A critical perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2010;19(4):433–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed