Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:42:55.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2008

DORIS SCHROEDER
Affiliation:
Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

Abstract

“Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.

The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.

The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.

All submitted papers are peer reviewed. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala at [email protected].I would like to thank research seminar members at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne, Australia, Armin Schmidt, Julie Lucas, and Tuija Takala for their helpful comments.

Type
DISSECTING BIOETHICS
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)