Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:00:45.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing a Model of Healthcare Ethics Support in Croatia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Extract

Croatia is a transitional society in that it is a country emerging from a socialist command economy toward a market-based economy with ensuing structural changes of a social and political nature—some extending into the healthcare system. A legacy from our past is that, until now, Croatian healthcare institutions have had no real experience with clinical ethics support services. When clinical cases arise presenting complex ethical dilemmas in treatment options, the challenges presented to the medical team are substantial. The case described below recently occurred on a ward in a university hospital in Croatia. An unexpected request from the patient’s parents created a number of issues that needed to be addressed by the medical team, which was made more difficult by the lack of clinical ethics support services. Such cases press the question currently being debated as to what type of ethics support services would be suitable for Croatia and why.

Type
Special Section: International Voices 2010
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. DuVal, G, Sartorius, L, Clarridge, B, Gensler, G, Danis, M. What triggers requests for ethics consultations? Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;Supplement 1:i24–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

2. Law on Protection of Patients’ Rights [in Croatian]. Narodne novine 169/2004.

3. Criminal Law [in Croatian]. Narodne novine 110/1997.

4. Law on Health Protection [in Croatian]. Narodne novine 150/2008.

5. Van McCrary, S, Swanson, J, Coulehan, J, Faber-Langendoen, K, Olick, RS, Belling, C. Physicians’ legal defensiveness in end-of-life treatment decisions: Comparing attitudes and knowledge in states with different laws. Journal of Clinical Ethics 2006;1:15–26Google Scholar.

6. Sorta-Bilajac, I, Bazdarić, K, Brozović, B, Agich, GJ. Croatian physicians’ and nurses’ experience with ethical issues in clinical practice. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;6:450–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Aleksandrova, S. Survey on the experience in ethical decision-making and attitude of Pleven University Hospital physicians towards ethics consultation. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2008;1:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Borovecki, A, ten Have, H, Oreskovic, S. Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: Hospital ethics committees in Croatia. British Medical Journal 2005;331:227–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

9. Steinkamp, N, Gordijn, B. The two-layer model of clinical ethics and a training program for the Malteser Hospital Association. HEC Forum 2001;3:242–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Steinkamp, N, Gordijn, B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2003;6:235–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Borovečki, A, ten Have, H, Orešković, S. Ethics committees in Croatia in the healthcare institutions. The first study about their structure and functions, and some reflections on the major issues and problems. HEC Forum 2006;1:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. See note 2, Law on Healthcare Protection 2008.

13. Borovecki, A, ten Have, H, Oreskovic, S. A critical analysis of hospital ethics committees: Opportunity or bureaucratic cul-de-sac? Društvena istraživanja 2006;6:1221–38Google Scholar.

14. Campbell, AV. Clinical governance—Watchword or buzzword? Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27(suppl. 1):i54–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.