Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T22:41:22.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Connecting the Dots in Cultural Competency: Institutional Strategies and Conceptual Caveats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2008

MICHAEL C. BRANNIGAN
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, The College of Saint Rose, Albany, NY

Extract

Hideo Kimura, a 46-year-old Japanese male patient in a Boston hospital, needs to undergo surgery to remove part of his lower intestine but resists signing the consent form and has little understanding of English. Discussing this with an interpreter, Hideo is puzzled, because he has already authorized his wife Sachiko to decide on his behalf. The interpreter points out to him that he has a right, a moral right, to give his informed consent to the surgery and that Hideo is quite competent to decide for himself. Nonetheless, Hideo cannot grasp the meanings of “informed consent” and “moral right.” Hideo agrees to sign the consent form only after he is told that this is official hospital policy.My thanks for insightful comments and critique by reviewers.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: ILLUMINATING CULTURE, HEALTH, AND ETHICS: BEYOND EQUALITY AND JUSTICE
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)