Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:00:05.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Student Performance between Two Instructional Delivery Methods for a Healthcare Ethics Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

HUGH A. STODDARD  and
TOBY SCHONFELD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Healthcare ethics has become part of the standard curriculum of students in the health professions. The goals of healthcare ethics education are to give students the skills they need to identify, assess, and address ethical issues in clinical practice and to develop virtuous practitioners. Incorporating the medical humanities into medical school, for example, is intended to foster empathy and professionalism among students and to provide mechanisms for enhanced physician well-being. Yet, despite the long-standing inclusion of the humanities in nursing curricula, increases in the amount and kinds of scientific knowledge essential for clinical practice has resulted in the erosion of the “humanistic arts” from nursing education. One potential solution to this challenge comes with the increase in interprofessional education, where students in a variety of healthcare professions programs come together to learn about issues common to all healthcare fields.

Type
Bioethics Education
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 493 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wong, G, Greenhalgh, T, Pawson, R. Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Medical Education 2010;10(1):12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Cook, DA, Levinson, AJ, Garside, S, Dupras, DM, Erwin, PJ, Montori, VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300(10):1181–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Eckles, RE, Meslin, EM, Gaffney, M, Helft, PR. Medical ethics education: Where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Academic Medicine 2005;80(12):1143–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Schwartz, AW, Abramson, JS, Wojnowich, I, Accordino, R, Ronan, EJ, Rifkin, MR. Evaluating the impact of the humanities in medical education. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 2009;76:372–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Dellasega, C, Milone-Nuzzo, P, Curci, KM, Ballard, JO, Kirch, DG. The humanities interface of nursing and medicine. Journal of Professional Nursing 2007;23(3):174–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Hanson, S. Teaching health care ethics: Why we should teach nursing and medical students together. Nursing Ethics 2005;12(2):167–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. See note 5, Hanson 2005.

7. See note 1, Wong et al. 2010; see also Mancuso-Murphy, J. Distance education in nursing: An integrated review of online nursing students’ experiences with technology-delivered instruction. Journal of Nursing Education 2007;46(6):252–60.Google ScholarPubMed

8. Christianson, L, Tiene, D, Luft, P. Web-based teaching in undergraduate nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Education 2002;27(6):276–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions. Internet education: Exploring the benefits and challenges of web-based education. Unites States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, S.HRG. 2003 September 26:107–752; Cravener, PA. Faculty experiences with providing online courses: Thorns among roses. Computers in Nursing 1999;17(1):42–7Google ScholarPubMed; Cuellar, N. The transition from classroom to online teaching. Nursing Forum 2002;37(3):5–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Grimes, EB. Student perceptions of an online dental terminology course. Journal of Dental Education 2002;66(1):100–7Google ScholarPubMed; Halstead, JA. Implementing web-based instruction in a school of nursing: Implications for faculty and students. Journal of Professional Nursing 2000;16(5):273–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morris, N, Buck-Rolland, C, Gagne, M. From bricks to bytes: Faculty and student perspectives of online graduate nursing courses. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2002;20(3):108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. See note 8, Christianson et al. 2002; see note 8, Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions 2003; see note 8, Cravener 1999; see note 8, Halstead 2000; see note 8, Morris et al. 2002; Hopkins, DD. The emergence of online learning in PN education. Journal of Practical Nursing 2008;58(4):4–7Google ScholarPubMed; Rick, C, Kearns, MA, Thompson, NA. The reality of virtual learning for nurses in the largest integrated health care system in the world. Nursing Administrator Quarterly 2003;27(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Litchfield, RD, Oakland, MJ, Anderson, JA. Improving dietetics education with interactive communication technology. Journal of the American Dietetics Association 2000;100(10):1191–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Hubble, MW, Richards, ME. Paramedic student performance: Comparison of online with on-campus lecture delivery methods. Prehospital Disaster Medicine 2006;21(4):261–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Nunn, J, Freeman, R, Anderson, E, Carneiro, LC, Carneiro, MS, Formicola, A, et al. . Inequalities in access to education and healthcare. European Journal of Dental Education 2008;12(Suppl. 1):30–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. See note 8, Christianson et al. 2002; see note 8, Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions 2003; see note 8, Cravener 1999; see note 8, Cuellar 2002; see note 8, Grimes 2002; see note 8, Morris et al. 2002; Pinch, WJE, Graves, JK. Using web-based discussion as a teaching strategy: Bioethics as an exemplar. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000;32(3):704–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. See note 8, Christianson et al. 2002; see note 8, Cravener 1999; Lindsay, GM, Jeffrey, J, Singh, M. Paradox of a graduate human science curriculum experienced online: A faculty perspective. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 2009;40(4):181–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14. See note 8, Cravener 1999.

15. See note 13, Lindsay et al. 2009.

16. See note 8, Cravener 1999; see note 8, Cuellar 2002; see note 8, Grimes 2002; see note 8, Halstead 2000; see note 8, Morris et al. 2002; Rochester, CD, Pradel, F. Students’ perceptions and satisfaction with a web-based human nutrition course. American Journal of Pharmacy Education 2008;72(4):91;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedHayward, LM, Cairns, MA. Allied health students’ perceptions of and experiences with internet-based case study instruction. Journal of Allied Health 2001;30(4):232–8.Google ScholarPubMed

17. See note 2, Eckles et al. 2005.

18. Schonfeld, TL, Stoddard, H. Comparison of online and traditional ethics education: A pilot study. Journal of Allied Health 2008;37(1):e22–33.Google ScholarPubMed

19. See note 18, Schonfeld, Stoddard 2008.

20. Russell, BL, Tekleselassie, A, Turnbull, D, Arthur, L, Burnham, J. A comparison in academic performance between distance and on-campus students in allied healthcare education. Journal of Allied Health 2008;37(1):e1–e21.Google ScholarPubMed

21. Livingston, EH, Elliot, A, Hynan, L, Cao, J. Effect size estimation: A necessary component of statistical analysis. Archives of Surgery 2009;144(8):706–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

22. Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2009Google Scholar; Khatony, A, Nayery, N, Ahmadi, F, Haghani, H, Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K. The effectiveness of web-based and face-to-face continuing education methods on nurses’ knowledge about AIDS: A comparative study. BMC Medical Education 2009;9(1):41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Averns, H, Maraschiello, M, van Melle, E, Day, A. Evaluation of a web-based teaching module on examination of the hand. The Journal of Rheumatology 2009;36(3):623–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Schneiderman, J, Corbridge, S, Zerwic, JJ. Demonstrating the effectiveness of an online, computer-based learning module for arterial blood gas analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist 2009;23(3):151–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

23. O’Neil, C, Fisher, C. Should I take this course online? Journal of Nursing Education 2008;47(2):53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

24. See note 10, Hubble, Richards 2006; see note 20, Russell et al. 2008; see note 22, Khatony et al. 2009.

25. Hale, LS, Mirakian, EA, Day, DB. Online vs classroom instruction: Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate allied health pharmacology course. Journal of Allied Health 2009;38(2):e36–42.Google Scholar

26. See note 20, Russell et al. 2008.

27. Justice, EM, Dornan, TM. Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-agecollege students. Adult Education Quarterly 2001;51(3):236–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Richardson, JTE. Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education 1995;20(1):5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. See note 11, Nunn et al. 2010; see note 23, O’Neil, Fisher 2008.

29. Dyrbye, L, Cumyn, A, Day, H, Heflin, M. A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences with online learning in a masters degree program: Benefits, challenges, and proposed solutions. Medical Teacher 2009;31(2):e40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30. Schonfeld, T. Reflections on teaching health care ethics on the web. Science and Engineering Ethics 2005;11(3):481–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

31. See note 10, Nunn et al. 2010; see note 25, Hale et al. 2009.