Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:13:24.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication about Advance Directives: Are Patients Sharing Information with Physicians?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Suzanne B. Yellen ,
Laurel A. Burton  and
Ellen Elpern
Suzanne B. Yellen
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology and Social Sciences and in the Section of Medical Oncology of the Department of Medicine at Rush Medical Center and is the Clinical Director of the Division of Psychosocial Oncology at the Rush Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
Laurel A. Burton
Affiliation:
Bishop Anderson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Religion and Human Values at Rush Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Ellen Elpern
Affiliation:
Clinical pulmonary nurse specialist and an Assistant Professor in the Section of Pulmonary Medicine of the Department of Medical Nursing at Rush Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historically, patients have deferred to physicians′ judgments about appropriate medical care, thereby limiting patient participation in treatment decisions. In this model of medical decision making, physicians typically decided upon the treatment plan. Communication with patients focused on securing their cooperation in accepting a treatment decision that essentially had already been made.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Fall 1992 , pp. 377 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Emmanuel, L, Barry, M, Stoeckle, J, et al. Advance directives for medical care–a case for greater use. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;324:889–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Gamble, E., McDonald, P, Lichstein, P.Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of elderly persons with living wills. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151:277–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. LaPuma, J., Orentlicher, D., Moss, R.Advance directives on admission: clinical implications and analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991;266:402–5.Google Scholar

4. Stolman, C, Gregory, J, Dunn, D, et al. Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do-not-resuscitate order. Archives of Internal Medicine 1990;150:653–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Holland, J. Clinical course of cancer. In: Holland, J., Rowland, J, eds. Handbook of Psychooncology. New York:Oxford University Press, 1989:75–100.Google Scholar

6. Bedell, S, Pelle, D, Maher, P, et al. Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital: how are they used and what is their impact?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1986;256:233–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. See note 6. Bedell, et al. , 1986:233–7.Google Scholar

8. Wilkinson, L.SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, Illinois:SYSTAT, Inc., 1987.Google Scholar

9. Bruning, J, Kintz, B.Computational Handbook of Statistics. Glenview, Illinois:Foresman and Co., 1977.Google Scholar

10. Rothman, KJ.No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990;1:43–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. See note 6. Bedell, et al. , 1986:233–7.Google Scholar

12. Lo, B, McLeod, G, Saika, G.Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Archives of Internal Medicine 1986;146:1613–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

13. Frankl, D., Oye, R, Bellamy, P.Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients. American Journal of Medicine 1989;86:645–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14. Seckler, A, Meier, D, Mulvihill, M, et al. Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions?. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991;115:92–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15. Schmerling, R, Bedell, S, Lilienfeld, A, et al. Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1988;3:317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. See note 12. Lo, et al. 1986:1613–5Google Scholar

17. See note 13. Frankl, et al. 1989:645–8Google Scholar

18. See note 14. Seckler, et al. 1991:92–98Google Scholar

19. See note 15. Schmerling, et al. 1988:317–21Google Scholar

20. See note 4. Stolman, et al. 1990:653–8Google Scholar

21. See note 13. Frankl, et al. 1989:645–8Google Scholar

22. Stewart, M, Roter, D.Communication with Medical Patients (Introduction). Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications, 1989.Google Scholar

23. See note 22. Stewart, , Roter, , 1989.Google Scholar

24. Kinzel, T.Relief of emotional symptoms in elderly patients with terminal cancer. Geriatrics 1988;43:61–68.Google ScholarPubMed

25. L., Degner Fostering patient participation in treatment decision-making. Paper presented at the 1991 International Consensus Conference on Doctor-Patient Communication, Toronto, Canada, 1991 Nov.Google Scholar

26. See note 13. Frankl, et al. , 1989:645–8.Google Scholar

27. D., O'Hare DNR orders in New York State. Paper presented at Controversies in the Care of the Dying Patient Conference, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, 1991, Feb.Google Scholar

28. See note 14. Seckler, et al. 1991:92–8Google Scholar

29. Uhlmann, R, Pearlman, R, Cain, K.Physicians′ and spouses′ predictions of elderly patients resuscitation preferences. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 1988;43:M115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30. See note 3. LaPuma, et al. 1991:402–5Google Scholar

31. See note 1. Emmanuel, et al. 1991:889–895Google Scholar

32. See note 3. LaPuma, et al. 1991:402–5Google Scholar

33. See note 1. Emmanuel, et al. 1991:889–895Google Scholar

34. See note 1. Emmanuel, et al. 1991:889–895Google Scholar

35. See note 25. Degner, . 1991.Google Scholar