Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:00:17.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

Joel Frader
Affiliation:
Children's Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University School of Medicine in Chicago

Abstract

Professionals in transplantation medicine have a particularly difficult task that most other healthcare professionals in the United States do not have to face explicitly. That is, the transplanters control the use of scarce solid organs. Because they invariably have more than one patient who might benefit from a new kidney (or liver, heart, etc.), they cannot focus single-mindedly on their duty to each and every patient as if no other patient mattered. In the case at hand, the patient has had more than one “gift” of a life-sustaining organ. At some centers, one, perhaps two, previous organs would count as “enough.” After that, the patient has had her chances and it is time to move on to others. Moreover, some believe the patient in this case has contributed to the current problem by inadequate care of the gifts she has been given.

Type
ETHICS COMMITTEES AT WORK
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)