Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:17:14.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

Paul B. Hofmann
Affiliation:
Paul B. Hofmann, Dr. P.H., is with Provenance Health Partners, Moraga, California. He is a fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives, a member of its Leadership Advisory Committee, and the College's consultant on healthcare management ethics

Extract

Like some ethical dilemmas, this question has an obvious answer that may not be right. On first reflection, it seems entirely unreasonable and inappropriate to expect staff members to withhold supportive care. Legally, a designated surrogate has the authority to refuse pain medication on the patient's behalf, but is it ethically defensible? A patient lacking decisionmaking capacity is crying out in pain; can we really imagine just closing the door? What do we say to other patients, visitors, and staff members, such as physicians, nurses, housekeepers, and dietary workers, who might hear the patient? Do we place a sign on the door, one noting that the surrogate has refused, on behalf of the patient, to authorize the administration of pain medication and that the hospital or nursing home must comply with the surrogate's decision?

Type
ETHICS COMMITTEES AT WORK
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)