Article contents
Commentary: What Kind of Fire or Whose Feet?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2010
Extract
Thirty years later we seem no closer to a consensus on the ethics of sterilizing profoundly mentally compromised young girls than was Judge Blumenfeld.
- Type
- Ethics Committees at Work
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
1. Ruby v. Massey, U.S. District Court of Connecticut No. 76-315, Oct. 31, 1977.
2. Gunter, DF, Diekema, DS. Attenuating growth in children with profound developmental disability: A new approach to an old dilemma. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2006;160:1013–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. http://pillowangel.org/Ashley%20Treatment%20v7.pdf (last accessed 24 mar 2010).
4. Caplan A. Is ‘Peter Pan’ treatment a moral choice? Available at http://ww.msnbc.msn.com/id/164729311 (last accessed 30 Oct 2009).
5. Duff, RS, Campbell, AGM. Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special care nursery. New England Journal of Medicine 1973:289:890–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
6. Paris, JJ. Terminating treatment for newborns: A theological perspective. Law, Medicine & Ethics 1982;10:120–4Google ScholarPubMed.
7. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).
8. Downs v. Sawtelle, 574 F.2d 1 (1978).
9. Paris, JJ, McCormick, R. Saving defective infants: Options for life or death. America April 23, 1983:313–7Google ScholarPubMed.
10. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants—HHS. Final rules. Federal Register 1984;49:1622–54Google Scholar.
11. Shaw, A, Randolph, JG, Manard, B. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: A national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons. Pediatrics 1977;60:588–99Google ScholarPubMed.
12. Brosco, JP, Feudtner, C. Growth attenuation: A diminutive solution to a daunting problem. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2006;160:1077–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
13. In the matter of Lee Ann Grady, 426 A.2d 467 [N.J. 1981].
- 1
- Cited by