Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:52:48.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: In the Interest of Fairness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2013

Denise M. Dudzinski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ethics Committees and Consultants at Work
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 401 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Dudzinski, DM.Ethics guidelines for destination therapy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006;81(4):1185–8.Google Scholar

2. Casida, JM, Marcuccilli, L, Peters, RM, Wright, S.Lifestyle adjustments of adults with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: A phenomenologic inquiry. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care 2011;40(6):511–20.Google Scholar

3. Chang, A, Dudzinski, D.One way out: Destination therapy by default. In: Ford, P, Dudzinski, D, eds. Complex Ethics Consultations: Cases That Haunt Us. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.Google Scholar