Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:38:27.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical Cultural Competence and the Threat of Ethical Relativism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2008

INSOO HYUN
Affiliation:
Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio

Extract

Taking seriously the value of cultural competence in healthcare requires at least three general commitments. First, it involves accepting the view that patients' health beliefs and behaviors are influenced to a significant degree by their own social and cultural practices. Second, it requires careful attention to how health professionals typically respond to patients' different social and cultural standards at various levels of the healthcare delivery system. And third, it calls for developing interventions that are sensitive to these first two issues to assure the delivery of quality healthcare for culturally diverse patients. This much is plain, insofar as we are talking about the broadest of commitments necessary to support the value of cultural competence in healthcare. But what other, more specific commitments are implied in accepting the value of cultural competence?I thank the guest editors of this issue, John R. Stone and Erika Blacksher, for their helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this paper.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: ILLUMINATING CULTURE, HEALTH, AND ETHICS: BEYOND EQUALITY AND JUSTICE
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)