Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:40:43.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autonomy Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2004

HETA ALEKSANDRA GYLLING
Affiliation:
Heta Aleksandra Gylling, D.Soc.Sc., is Professor of Applied Philosophy at the Department of Moral and Social Philosophy at the University of Helsinki, Finland. She is working on issues related to Development Ethics

Extract

One of the core issues in medical ethics has been and still is autonomy, people's right to make their own self-regarding choices in situations where more than one option is available. Depending on the case, these choices may be influenced by personal life history, one's ethical and other values, and one's future expectancies. A professional soccer player may risk an operation, which for a less athletic individual would represent an unnecessary risk that might jeopardize her ability to even walk. Saying no to painkillers may sound irrational to those who do not see anything ennobling in avoidable suffering, and preferring homeopathic medicine to more evidence-based medicine may lead others to seriously doubt the logic of one's thinking. But although these situations may be difficult,1 they seldom lead to an impasse. Even if serious value conflicts emerge in these patient–medical personnel encounters, they can be overcome by the fact that, in Western countries, honoring patients' autonomy has been widely accepted as part of medical professionalism.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: DISSECTING BIOETHICS
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)