Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:21:51.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Intelligence

The Shylock Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

DAVID R. LAWRENCE ,
CÉSAR PALACIOS-GONZÁLEZ  and
JOHN HARRIS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

It seems natural to think that the same prudential and ethical reasons for mutual respect and tolerance that one has vis-à-vis other human persons would hold toward newly encountered paradigmatic but nonhuman biological persons. One also tends to think that they would have similar reasons for treating we humans as creatures that count morally in our own right. This line of thought transcends biological boundaries—namely, with regard to artificially (super)intelligent persons—but is this a safe assumption? The issue concerns ultimate moral significance: the significance possessed by human persons, persons from other planets, and hypothetical nonorganic persons in the form of artificial intelligence (AI). This article investigates why our possible relations to AI persons could be more complicated than they first might appear, given that they might possess a radically different nature to us, to the point that civilized or peaceful coexistence in a determinate geographical space could be impossible to achieve.

Keywords

artificial intelligencehumanitymotivationsurvivalmoral significancepersonhoodnature
Type
Special Section: Responsibility, Vulnerability, Dignity, and Humanity
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 250 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Shakespeare, W. The Merchant of Venice. In: Proudfoot, R, Thomson, A, Kastan, DS, eds. The Arden Shakespeare, Complete Works. Walton-On-Thames: Thomas Nelson and Sons; 1998, at 842–3.Google Scholar

2. Locke, J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1979, at bk. II, chap. 27, sec. 9.Google Scholar

3. Palacios-González C. Robotic Persons and Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics [unpublished manuscript].

4. Harris, J. The Value of Life. London: Routledge; 1985, at chap. 1. 7–27.Google ScholarPubMed

5. See note 4, Harris 1985, at 9–10.

6. Harris, J. How to Be Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press; forthcoming.Google Scholar

7. See note 6, Harris forthcoming.

8. A possible exception to this is a situation in which the AI is created by means of whole human brain emulation. Cf. Bostrom, N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar

9. See note 8, Bostrom 2014, at 107.

10. See note 8, Bostrom 2014, at 107.

11. Many readers will remember the seven life processes in the form of that friendly soul “MRS GREN”: movement, respiration, sensitivity, growth, reproduction, excretion, and nutrition. BBC Bitesize. Chemical Reactions in Living Things; 2014; available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/add_ocr_21c/life_processes/reactionsrev1.shtml (last accessed 16 Apr 2015).

12. McKay, C. What is life—and how do we search for it in other worlds? Public Library of Science—Biology, PLoS Biology 2004;2(9):e302.Google ScholarPubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020302; Trifonov, E. Definition of life: Navigation through uncertainties. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 2012;29(4):647–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

13. Rybicki, E. The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems with virus systematics. South African Journal of Science 1990;86:182–6.Google Scholar

14. This observation has been long established in the literature; for example: Penman, S. Virus metabolism and cellular architecture. Virology 1985;169–82Google Scholar; Luria, S. Bacteriophage: An essay on virus reproduction. Science 1950;111(2889):507–11;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed and Choppin, P, Richard, W. The structure of influenza virus. The Influenza Viruses and Influenza 1975;15–51.Google ScholarPubMed

15. Trifonov, E. Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2011;29(2):259–66, at 262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed It should be said, of course, that this is far from agreed on—there is a strong contention that “attempts to define life are irrelevant” (Szostak, J. Attempts to define life do not help to understand the origin of life. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2012;29(4):599–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar) or even futile, which may well be true from a purely scientific perspective, though it is a useful conceit when considering AI.

16. Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

17. Studer G, Lipson H. Spontaneous emergence of self-replicating structures in molecube automata. Proceedings of the 10th Int. Conference on Artificial Life (ALIFE X) 2006;227–33.

18. The team had previously built a smaller number of these machines, which demonstrate the physical capability to self-replicate. Zykov, V, Mytilinaios, E, Adams, B, Lipso, H. Self-reproducing machines. Nature 2005;435(7038):163–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

19. For instance, the choice to opt for suicide or to not have children directly contravenes the survival instinct of the individual or the germline but is likely to fulfill other motivations that the chooser considers of a higher importance.

20. “Lower” here refers to intelligence, rather than a misinterpretation of Linnaean taxonomy or Darwinistic descent.

21. Harris, J. Intimations of immortality. Science 2000 Apr;288(5463):59;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedHarris, J. Intimations of immortality—the ethics and justice of life extending therapies. In: Michael, F, ed. Current Legal Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:65–97.Google Scholar

22. Hoyle, F. The Black Cloud. New York: Buccaneer Books; 1957.Google Scholar

23. This concept was developed throughout lectures collected in Von Neumann J. The Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. Burks A, ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1966; but it was given the colloquial name apocryphally.

24. Freitas, R Jr. A self-reproducing interstellar probe. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 1980;33:251–64.Google Scholar

25. This is true at least in the case of these authors, though the motorcyclist among us maintains innocence by way of fuel efficiency.

26. See note 8, Bostrom 2014; Barrat, J. Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. New York: Macmillan; 2013.Google Scholar

27. As John Harris suggested in How to Be Good; see note 6, Harris forthcoming.

28. Cellan-Jones R. Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC News 2014 Dec 2; available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30290540 (last accessed 29 December 2015).

29. Rodgers P. Elon Musk warns of terminator tech. Forbes 2014 Aug 5; available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrodgers/2014/08/05/elon-musk-warns-ais-could-exterminate-humanity/ (last accessed 29 December 2015).

30. See note 8, Bostrom 2014, at 109.

31. See note 8, Bostrom 2014, at 259.

32. Neurath, O. Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis 1932;3(1):204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Quoted in Rabossi, E. Some notes on Neurath’s ship and Quine’s sailors. Principia 2003;7(1–2):171–84;Google Scholar available at https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/viewFile/14799/13509 (last accessed 16 Apr 2015). Quine also used Neurath’s metaphor in his A Logical Point of View. 2nd ed. revised. New York: Harper; 1963, at 78.

33. Wittgenstein L. On Certainty. Paudl D, Anscombe GEM, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1969, at para. 253 and 247.

34. Janik, A, Toulmin, S. Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1973.Google Scholar

35. See note 1, Shakespeare 1998.

36. We treat fictional beings as real enough for the purposes of this locution.

37. However, Hare misapplies this tool in the case of abortion. Hare, RM. Abortion and the Golden Rule. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1975 Spring; 4(3):201–22.Google ScholarPubMed

38. See note 6, Harris forthcoming, at chap. II. The extracted section here is adapted rather than a verbatim quotation from this source.

39. Kubrick S, Clarke AC. 2001: A Space Odyssey [film]. Metro Goldwyn-Mayer; 1968.

40. See note 6, Harris forthcoming.

41. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Anscombe GEM, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1958, at part II, xi, 223. “If a lion could speak, we would not understand him.”

42. Here we continue to talk of course of what might be termed “ultimate moral significance”—that is, the significance possessed by human persons, persons from other planets, and nonorganic persons in the form of AI if and when they appear.