Article contents
Arguments against Respecting a Minor's Refusal of Efficacious Life-Saving Treatment Redux, Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2009
Abstract
This CQ department is dedicated to bringing noted bioethicsts together in order to debate some of the most perplexing contemporary bioethics issues. You are encouraged to contact “The Great Debates” department editor, D. Micah Hester ([email protected]), UAMS/Humanities, 4301 W. Markham St. #646, Little Rock, AR 72205, with any suggestions for debate topics and interlocutors you would like to see published herein.
- Type
- The Great Debates
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
1. Blustein J. Response. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2009;18(3):315–320.
2. Ross LF. Children, Families and Health Care Decision Making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998:56–74.
3. See note 1, Blustein 2009:317.
5. Weithorn L, Campbell S. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Development 1982;53:1589–98; Gardner W, Scherer D, Tester M. Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal right. American Psychologist 1989;44:897–9; Scherer DG. Annett RD, Brody JL. Ethical issues in adolescent and parent informed consent for pediatric asthma research participation. Journal of Asthma 2007;44(7):489–96.
6. See note 2, Ross 1998:72.
7. See note 1, Blustein 2009:318.
8. See note 2, Ross 1998:61.
9. Girl flees after clash of cultures on illness. New York Times, 1994 Nov 12.
10. Brody JL, Scherer DG, Annett RD, Turner C, Dalen J. Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: The effects of adolescent gender and research risk. Pediatrics 2005;118(2):e356–62.
11. Miles SH, August A. Courts, gender and "the right to die." Law, Medicine & Health Care 1990;18(1–2):85–95.
12. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Hosp. v. Anderson, 201 A.2d 537 (N.J.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 985 (1964); Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College, 331 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Cir. 1964); Hamilton v. McAuliffe, 277 Md. 336, 353 A.2d 634 (1976); Powell v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, 49 Misc. 2d 215, 267 N.Y.S.2d 450 (1965).
13. See note 1, Blustein 2009:317.
14. Coles R. The Moral Life of Children. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press; 1986.
15. See note 14, Coles 1986.
16. See note 1, Blustein 2009:320.
17. See note 1, Blustein 2009:320.
18. Kliever LD, ed. Dax's Case: Essays in Medical Ethics and Human Meaning. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press; 1989.
19. McGee G. Dear Dax [An interview with Dax Cowart]. Penn Bioethics 1997;2(4):1,2,4 at p. 4.
20. Clayton EW. Response. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2009;18(3):322.
21. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Committee on Bioethics (COB). Religious Objections to Medical Care. Pediatrics 1997;99(2):279–81.
22. See note 21, AAP COB 1997:280.
23. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Committee on Bioethics (COB). Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;95(2):314–7.
24. See note 23, AAP COB 1995:317.
25. See note 23, AAP COB 1995:317.
26. See note 20, Clayton 2009:320.
27. Ross LF. Health Care Decision Making by Children: Is It in Their Best Interest? Hastings Center Report 1997 27(6):41–5.
28. See note 2, Ross 1998:5–6.
29. See note 20, Clayton 2009:321.
30. Ridgway D. Court-mediated disputes between physicians and families over the medical care of children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2004;158:891–6.
31. See note 30, Ridgway 2004.
32. Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 321 U.S. 158 (1944).
33. See note 32, Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1944:170.
34. See note 1, Blustein 2009:316.
35. Purdy L. In Their Best Interest? The Case against Equal Rights for Children. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1992:81.
36. See note 35, Purdy 1992:78.
- 6
- Cited by