Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:45:52.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anchor and Course for the Modern Ship of Casuistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Malcolm Macpherson-Smith
Malcolm Macpherson-Smith
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen in Scotland, where he Is qualified as a principal in General Practice, and Is currently an assistant professor at the Eastern Virginia Medical School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So much philosophical theory is irrelevant for the practice of ethics! How many wasted volumes of tortuous arguments and counterarguments have been written in search of an elusive theory of ethics that could be applied deductively, without modification, to produce “correct” answers under all circumstances to any ethical problem? The practice of ethics is much closer to the common sense casuistry approach outlined by Jonsen and Toulmin, in which we work from. intuitively grasped, paradigm, cases by way of analogy to provide presumptive answers to more complex problems. Alasdair Maclntyre argued however that we cannot trust such individualistic intuitive judgements. Thus we should start by looking at his critique of modern ethics.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 391 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Jonsen, A, Toulmin, S. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

2. Downing, L, Thigpen, R. After telos; the implications of Maclntyre's attempt to restore the concept in After Virtue. Social Theory and Practice 1984;10:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Maclntyre, A. After Virtue. 2nd ed.Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984:11–12.Google Scholar

4. Maclntyre, A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988:252.Google Scholar

5. See note 4. MacIntyre, . 1988:252.Google Scholar

6. See note 4. MacIntyre, . 1988:224.Google Scholar

7. Mullins, W. Book review of After Virtue. Canadian Journal of Political Science 1983;16:827.Google Scholar

8. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:275.Google Scholar

9. See note 4. MacIntyre, . 1988:chapt. 18.Google Scholar

10. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:275.Google Scholar

11. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:187.Google Scholar

12. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:275.Google Scholar

13. See note 2. Downing, , Thigpen, . 1984:44–5.Google Scholar

14. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:55.Google Scholar

15. Wallace, RJ. Review essays. History and Theory 1989;28:328.Google Scholar

16. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:58.Google Scholar

17. See note 4. MacIntyre, . 1988:357.Google Scholar

18. See note 3. MacIntyre, . 1984:60.Google Scholar

19. See note 1. Jonsen, , Toulmin, . 1988:293.Google Scholar

20. Sabelli, H, Synnestvedt, J. Personalization. A Vision for the Millennium. Chicago: Society for the Advancement of Clinical Philosophy, 1990:24–9.Google Scholar

21. Cortese, A. Ethnic Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990:chapt. 5.Google Scholar

22. Ellos, W. Ethical Practice in Clinical Medicine. New York: Rutledge, 1990:133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Reid, T. Essay on the Active Powers of Man. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983:359.Google Scholar

24. Moreno, J. Ethics by committee: the moral authority of consensus. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1988;13:242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. See note 22. Ellos, . 1990:137.Google Scholar

26. Arras, J. Common law morality. Hastings Center Report 07/08 1990;20(4):37.Google ScholarPubMed

27. Hampshire, S. Innocence and Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1989:118.Google Scholar

28. Pellegrino, ED, Thomasma, DC. For the Patient's Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988:32, 54.Google Scholar

29. Thomasma, DC. Human Life in the Balance. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990:60.Google Scholar

30. See note 29. Thomasma, . 1990:129.Google Scholar

31. See note 22. Ellos, . 1990:133.Google Scholar

32. See note 22. Ellos, . 1990:136.Google Scholar

33. Loewy, E. Suffering and the Beneficent Community. Buffalo: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar

34. Jensen, U. Practice and Progress. Boston: Black well, 1987:213.Google Scholar