Article contents
Acting or Letting Go: Medical Decision Making in Neonatology in The Netherlands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
The development of neonatology and the establishment of neonatal intensive care units has led to a vast array of new medical ethical problems and dilemmas centered around discontinuing treatment or nontreatment decisions. Neonatology has become one of the fields that has made clear that medical success is only rarely nonproblematic. The new technology can be a blessing for some, but it may also become a sad experience to others, with life-long repercussions.
The ethical problems of neonatology transcend national boundaries. Nevertheless, there are differences in approach among various countries. In The Netherlands, the ethical deliberations have been a matter of public debate, but most of the decision making is left to the medical profession; these decisions are considered too harsh for the general public. Recently, two developments have emerged. The Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) and the Dutch Pediatrics Society have published reports with guidelines and ethical reflections. Over the same period of time, cases have been brought to court for legal analysis and the development of case precedence.
- Type
- Special Section: From Cells to Selves: Ethics at the Beginning of Life
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993
References
Notes
1. Royal Dutch Medical Association Committee. Acceptability of life ending treatment. Medisch Contact 1988;43:697–704.Google Scholar
2. Sectie Perinatologie van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde [Perinatology Section of the Dutch Union of Paediatrics]. Doen of Laten [Acting or deciding to forgo: limits of medical treatment in neonatology]. Dutch Union of Pediatrics, 1992 Nov.
3. Molenaar, JC, Gill, K, Geneeskunde, Dupuis H., dienares derbarmhartigheid. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1988;42:1913–7.Google Scholar
4. Molenaar, JC. Het nalaten van medisch handelen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1988;42:1925.Google Scholar
5. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht [Journal for Health Law] 1989 09;391–8.Google Scholar
6. Hubben, HJ. Opinie. Nederlands Juristenblad [Dutch Attorney's Magazine] 1989;25:914–5.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by