Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:18:11.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abstracts of Note: The Bioethics Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2008

KENNETH V. ISERSON
Affiliation:
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson

Abstract

This section is meant to be a mutual effort. If you find an article you think should be abstracted in this section, do not be bashful—submit it for consideration to feature editor Kenneth V. Iserson care of CQ. If you do not like the editorial comments, this will give you an opportunity to respond in the letters section. Your input is desired and anticipated.

Type
Abstracts of Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ness, RB. Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research. JAMA 2007;298(18):2164–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, A. Patient involvement in a professional body: Reflections and commentary. Journal of Health Organization & Management 2007;21(4–5):460–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, KB, Delorio, NM, Schmidt, TA, Chiodo, G, Gorman, P. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33(5):289–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotzsche, PC, Hrobjartsson, A, Johansen, HK, Haahr, MT, Altman, DG, Chan, AW. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLoS Medicine 2007;4(1):e19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group. Ethical issues in the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial. AIDS 2007;21 Suppl 2:S69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar