No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An Update from Australia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2014
In recent years the Australian parliament has been considering the rights to protection from discrimination of intersex and gender identity disorder (GID) people. In 2013 such protections were made law in the amendment to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, which in turn has influenced Senate inquiries into the medical treatment of intersex people. This year’s Australian report describes the purview and the potential ramifications of the inquiry of the Senate Standing Committees on Community Affairs, published in October 2013, into the involuntary or coerced sterilization of intersex people in Australia.
1. Cregan K. Who do you think you are? Childhood and identity in Australian healthcare ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2013;22(3):232–7.
2. Tomazin F. “Suddenly she’s there”: Daughter and donor dad united. The Age 2013 Mar 17; available at http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/suddenly-shes-there-daughter-and-donor-dad-united-20130316-2g7mv.html (last accessed 9 June 2013).
3. Law Reform Committee. Inquiry into Access by Donor-Conceived People to Information about Donors. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer; 2012.Google Scholar
4. Parliament of Victoria. Inquiry into Access by Donor-Conceived People to Information about Donors: Victorian Government Response, August 2013. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria; 2013, at 7.
5. See note 1, Cregan 2013.
6. Tomazin F. Push to give “donor babies” right to know. The Age 2013 June 9; available at www.theage.com.au/Victoria/push-to-give-donor-babies-right-to-know-20120608-2nwxt.html (last accessed 9 June 2013).
7. Family Court of Australia. Re Jamie [2011] FamCA 248; 2012; available at http://www.familycourt.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/FCOA/home/ (last accessed 13 Oct 2013).
8. Family Court of Australia. Re Jamie [2013] FamCAFC 110; 2013; available at http://www.familycourt.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/FCOA/home/ (last accessed 13 Oct 2013).
9. Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee. Inquiry Report on the Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013 [Provisions]. Canberra: Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee Secretariat; 2013.Google Scholar
10. The Senate has two such committees, and the report was by the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee.
11. See note 9, Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 2013, at 3.73.
12. See note 9, Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 2013, at 3.66.
13. See note 9, Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 2013, submission 8, page 3, cited at 3.5.
14. See note 9, Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 2013, at 1.11.
15. In this case, the Senate’s Community Affairs Reference Committee.
16. Community Affairs References Committee. Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of Intersex People in Australia; 2013; available at http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Involuntary_Sterilisation (last accessed 1 Dec 2013).
17. See note 16, Community Affairs References Committee 2013, report 2, at 1.2.
18. See note 16, Community Affairs References Committee 2013, report 2, at 1.1.
19. Commonwealth of Australia. First Report: Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of People with Disabilities in Australia. Canberra: Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat; 2013.Google Scholar
20. Commonwealth of Australia. Second Report: Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of Intersex People in Australia. Canberra: Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat; 2013.
21. Cregan, K. Regulating ethics in Australian healthcare research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2012;21(3):384–90.Google Scholar
22. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 2.20, 2.21.
23. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 3.130, 3.133.
24. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 5.2.
25. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 5.7.
26. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 4.43, 5.30, 5.31, 5.32.
27. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 5.38, 5.41, 5.70, 5.72, 6.11.
28. See note 20, Commonwealth of Australia 2013, Second Report, at 6.25, 6.27, 1.5.