Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:51:51.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses and Dialogue: Response to “Determinants of Decision Making for Circumcision” by C. Ciesielski-Carlucci, N. Milliken, and N. H. Cohen (CQ, Vol 5, No 2)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments and Columns
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , Winter 1997 , pp. 88 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

page 89 note 1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;95(2):314–7.Google Scholar

page 89 note 2. Little v Little, 576 S.W. 2d 493–5.

page 89 note 3. Re Richardson, 284 So 2d 185–7.

page 89 note 4. Wisconsin v Yoder (1972), 406 U.S. 205, 234.

page 89 note 5. Kate's School v Department of Health (1979), 155 Cal. Rptr. 529.

page 89 note 6. Valerie N. v Valerie N. (1985), 219 Cal, Rptr. 387.

page 89 note 7. Prince v Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944).

page 89 note 8. Bonner, CA, Kinane, MJ. Circumcision: the legal and constitutional issues. The Truth Seeker 1989 (July/August): S1–S4.Google Scholar

page 89 note 9. Thompson, HC, King, LR, Knox, E et al. , Report of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56(4):610–1.Google Scholar

page 89 note 10. . American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 1989;84(5):388–91.Google ScholarPubMed

page 92 note 1. Taylor, JR, Lockwood, AP, Taylor, AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. British Journal Urology 1996;77:291–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 92 note 2. Hammond, T. Awakenings. San Francisco: Market Street Press, 1994.Google Scholar

page 92 note 3. The average cost ($200) x the number performed each year in U.S. (the huge cost of complications not included).

page 92 note 4. National Center for Health Statistics, 1980, 1993.

page 92 note 5. Milos, MF, Macris, D. Circumcision, a medical or a human rights issue? Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1992;37:87S–96S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 92 note 6. Gee, WF, Ansell, JS. Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview. Pediatrics 1976;58:824–7.Google ScholarPubMed

page 92 note 7. Gostin, L, Mann, J. Toward the development of a human rights impact assessment for the formulation and evaluation of health policies. Health and Human Rights 1994;1(1):58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 92 note 8. Denniston, GC. Circumcision and the code of ethics. Humane Health Care International 1996;12:78–80.Google ScholarPubMed

page 92 note 9. Anand, KJS, Hickey, PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. NEJM 1987;317:1321–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

page 92 note 10. Denniston, GC. “Modern” circumcision: escalation of a ritual. Circumcision Vol 1 No 1. A virtual journal at http://weber.u.Washington. edu~gcd/QRCUMCISION.Google Scholar