Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:03:48.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Strong and Beauchamp

At World’s End

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

REBECCA KUKLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Great Debates
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 99 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Beauchamp, TL. On common morality as embodied practice: A reply to Kukla. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2014;23:86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Strong, C.Kukla’s argument against common morality as a set of precepts: On stranger tides. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2014;23:93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Kukla, R.Living with pirates: Common morality and embodied practice. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2014;23:75–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed