No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Private Health Insurance Industry: The Real Barrier to Healthcare Access?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
Any humane society needs a just and compassionate way to care for those who are sick, and should be vigilant in identifying and eliminating barriers that frustrate efforts to adequately care for the sick. Some current insurance underwriting practices constitute effective barriers to access to healthcare and serve to diminish the place of freedom and justice in our healthcare system.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994
References
Notes
1. Callahan, D. Allocating health resources. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18(2): 15.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Mellman & Lazarus, Inc. National health care reform survey commissioned by Aetna. Statistical Bulletin 1992;73(4):4.Google Scholar
3. Ginzberg, E. The Medical Triangle: Physicians, Politicians, and the Public. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1990:3–53.Google Scholar
4. Schramm, CJ. Government, private health insurance, and the goal of universal health care coverage. Inquiry 1992;29:263.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Aaron, HJ. Serious and Unstable Condition: Financing America's Health Care. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1991:36.Google Scholar
6. Bodenheimer, T. Should we abolish the private health insurance industry? International Journal of Health Services 1990; 20(2):199–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. See note 4. Schramm, . 1992:263.Google Scholar
8. Clifford, KA, Iuculano, RP. AIDS and insurance: the rationale for AIDS-related testing. Harvard Law Review 1987;100:1806–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Cited in Murray, TH. Genetics and the moral mission of health insurance. Hastings Center Report 1992;22(6):14.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Kass, NE. Insurance for the insurers: the use of genetic tests. Hastings Center Report 1992;22(6):8.Google Scholar
10. Daniels, N. Just Health Care. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Daniels, N. Insurability and the HIV epidemic: ethical issues in underwriting. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1991;68:497–525.Google Scholar
12. I am grateful to Phoebe Lindsey Barton, Ph.D. for bringing this fact to my attention.
13. See note 4. Schramm, . 1992:263–8.Google Scholar
14. See note 4. Schramm, . 1992:263.Google Scholar
15. See note 9. Kass, . 1992:6–11.Google Scholar
16. See note 8. Murray, . 1992:12–7.Google Scholar
17. See note 8. Murray, 1992:14.Google Scholar
18. See note 11. Daniels, . 1990:497–525.Google Scholar
19. Smurl, J. Distributing the burden fairly: ethics and national health policy. Man and Medicine 1980;5:97–125.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Rosenthal, E. Fraud is ballooning in health insurance. International Herald Tribune 1990 07. 7–8:3.Google Scholar
21. Kelly, S. Impact of fraudulent claims on health care costs. Statistical Bulletin 1991;72(4):13–9.Google ScholarPubMed
22. See note 21. Kelly, . 1991:13.Google Scholar
23. Woolhandler, S, Himmelstein, DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the U.S. health care system. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;324:1253–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Kramon, G. Insurers reviewing doctors' plans. The Denver Post 1991 03. 3: 10G.Google Scholar
25. Sipress, A. Job rules are hitting close to home. The Denver Post 1991 04. 7: 11A.Google Scholar
26. Zellers, WK, McLaughlin, CG, Frick, KD. Small business health insurance: only the healthy need apply. Health Affairs Quarterly 1992;11:174–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. See note 4. Schramm, . 1992:263–8.Google Scholar
28. Smith, MD, Altman, EE, Leitman, R et al. Taking the public's pulse on health system reform. Health Affairs Quarterly 1992;11:129–131.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Freudenheim, M. Millions face risk of benefits loss. The Denver Post 1992 08. 2: 4H.Google Scholar