Article contents
Physician Refusal of Requests for Futile or Ineffective Interventions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
Extract
Several recent articles raise an issue long unaddressed in the medical literature: physician compliance with patient or family requests for futile or ineffectice therapy. Although they agree philosophically that such treatment ought not be given, most physicians have followed the course described by Stanley Fiel, in which a young patient dying of cystic fibrosis was accepted “for evaluation” by a transplant center even though he has already passed the threshold of viability as a candidate for a heart-lung transplant. Dr. Fiel reported this action was taken not in the hope of doing the transplant but so that the family could assure themselves they had done “everything possible.” The patient, after a long and stressful cross-country flight, arrived at the hospital in respiratory failure. He died soon thereafter far from home and familiar surroundings.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
Notes
1. Paris, JJCrone, RKReardon, F.Physicians' refusal of requested treatment: the case of Baby L. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322: 1012–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Tomlinson, TBrody, H.Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical As sociation 1990; 264: 1276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hackler, JCHiller, FC.Family Consent to orders not to resuscitate: reconsidering hospital policy. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1281–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fiel, SB.Heart–lung transplantation for patients with cystic fibrosis. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991; 151: 870–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Tresch, DDSims, FHDuthie, EH et al. Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991; 151: 930–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Fiel, S.Heart-lung transplantation for patients with cystic fibrosis. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991; 151: 870–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Tomlinson, TBrody, H.Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Wolf, SM. “Near death” —in the moment of decision. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322: 208–10. See p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Pellegrino, E.Ethics in AIDS treatment decisions. Origins 1990: 19: 539–44.Google Scholar
10. Brock, DWWartman, SA.When competent patients make irrational choices. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322: 1595–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Do Not Resuscitate Orders: The Proposed Legislation and Report of the New York State Task Firce on Life and the Law. Albany, New York: The Task Force, 1986.Google Scholar
12. Rosenthal, E.Rules on reviving the dying bring undeue suffering, doctors contend. New York Times 1990 Oct. 4:A1.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Amundsen, DW.The physician's obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots Hastings Center Reports 1978; 8: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Deciding To Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, D.C.: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1983. See p. 3.Google Scholar
15. Paris, JJCrone, RKReardon, F.Physicians' refusal of requested treatment: the case of Baby L. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322: 1012–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Fiel, S.Heart–lung transplantation for patients with cystic fibrosis. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991; 151: 870–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Tresch, DDSims, FHDuthie, EH et al. Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991; 151: 930–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Hadorn, DC.Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991; 265: 2218–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Chervenak, FAMcCullough, LB.Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Center Report 1991; 21: 12–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Younger, SJ.Who degines futility? Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 260: 2094–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Tomlinson, TBrody, H.Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Hackler, JCHiller, FC.Family consent to order not to resuscitate. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1281–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Bedell SF Delbanco TL Cook EF Survival after cardiopulmonart resuscitation in the hospital. New England Journal of Medicine 1983; 309: 569–76.Google Scholar
24. Blackhall, LJ.Must we always use CPR? New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 317: 1281–4. See p. 1281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Tomlinson, T.Brody H. Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders. New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 318: 43–6. See p. 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Murphy, DJ.Do-not-resuscitate orders: time for reappraisal in long-term care institutions. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 260: 2098–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Lantos JD. Miles SM Silverstein MD Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight: Is CPR futile therapy? New England of Medicine 1988; 318: 91–5.Google Scholar
28. Younger, SJ.Who defines futility? Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 260: 2094–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Murphy, DJ.DO-not-resuscitate orders: time for reappraisal in long-term care institutions. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 260: 2098–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Lantos, JDSinger, PAWalker, RM et al. The illusion of futility in clinical practice. The American Journal of Medicine 1989; 87: 87: 83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. SEe note 30. Lantos et al. 1989; 87: 83.Google Scholar
32. Schneiderman, LJJecker, NSJonsen, ARMedical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990; 112: 949–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. See note 32. Schneiderman et al. 1990; 112: 950.Google Scholar
34. Moore, FD.The desperate case: CARE (costs, applicability, reserach, ethics). Journal of the American Medical Association 1991; 261: 1483–4. See p. 1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Selection from the Hippocratic Corpus: “The Art” (circa 5th-4th century B.C.). In: Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ, eds. Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Concerns Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1977: 6–7.Google Scholar
36. Plato. The Republic. Translated by GMA Grude. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
37. Vatican. Declaration on euthanasia, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrines of the Faith. In: Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, D.C.: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1983; 322: 1012–5.Google Scholar
38. Paris, JJCrone, RKReardon, F.Physicians' refusal of requested treatment: the case of Baby L. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322:1012–5.Google ScholarPubMed
39. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital 398 Mass, 417, 497 N.E. 2d 626 (1986).Google Scholar
40. Hackler, JCHiller, FC.Family consent to orders not to resuscitate: reconsidering hospital policy. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1281–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Tomlinson, TBrody, H.Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. Journal of the American Medical As sociation 1990; 264: 1276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Younger, SJ.Futility in context Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1295–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Hackler, JCHiller, FC.Family Consent to orders not to resuscitate: reconsidering hospital policy. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 264: 1281–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. See note 3. Hackler and Hiller. 1990; 264: 1282.Google Scholar
45. See note 3. Hackler and Hiller. 1990; 264: 1282.Google Scholar
- 23
- Cited by