Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:19:55.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perspective: Death: Right or Duty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

Richard D. Lamm
Affiliation:
Director of the Center for Public Policy and Contemporary Issues at the University of Denver and is former Governor of Colorado.

Extract

Too often, the limits of our language are the limits of our thinking. “If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought,” warned George Orwell. How we label something too often controls how we think about it. We get particular concepts in our head and they are hard to change. They govern how we think and how we act. “Disease” and “death” used to be considered as “God's will,” and it took hundreds of years and no small number of martyrs to get that corrected. It was very hard to develop modern medicine when so many subjects were thought of as outside of human control. Similarly, the number of children a woman had was thought to be “God's will,” and that has made the development of contraception controversial to this day. Human control over any part of human destiny is usually opposed vigorously. Humankind has the tendency to confuse the familiar with the necessary.

Type
Departments and Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. Graig, LA. Health of Nations: An International Perspective on U.S. Healthcare Reform. Wyatt Co. 1991.Google Scholar