No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Individual Autonomy and Collective Decisionmaking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
Because of the emphasis on individualism and self-governance, medical interventions and medical research in Western nations are preceded by attempts to obtain informed consent from the individual patient or potential research subject. Individual autonomy expresses our belief that persons are ends in themselves and not merely instrumentalities to achieve the goals of others. By respecting the patient or potential research subject in the context of medical decisionmaking, we acknowledge that these individuals are moral agents. Thus, individual autonomy is an important feature of morality as it is practiced in the West. However, there are at least two circumstances in which individual autonomy appears to be threatened. One is embodied in nonwestern societies that favor collective decisionmaking over that of the individual. The other is related to the need for family histories and family testing to determine the susceptibility of family members to some genetically based disease. In both cases, individual judgment appears to be made subordinate to collective judgment.
- Type
- Perspective
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997
References
Notes
1. Benn, SI. Freedom, autonomy and the concept of a person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1976;LXXVI:124.Google Scholar
2. Lidz, CW, Meisel, A, Informed Consent: a Study of Decision Making in Psychiatry. New York: The Guilford Press, 1984:18.Google Scholar
3. One should bear in mind that the issue of individual autonomy must be kept distinct from the question whether some forms of genetic testing can legitimately occur without consent.