Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:17:57.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethical Role of the Consultant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

William B. Weeks  and
William A. Nelson
William B. Weeks
Affiliation:
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River JunctionDartmouth Medical School
William A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Community and Family Medicine at Dartmouth Medical School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the United States, physicians are Increasingly functioning In the consultative role. This change in role Is undoubtedly a result of a surge in the numbers of specialists, the relative decreasing number of primary care physicians, and the emergence of tertiary care centers as primary treatment providers. This change In the style of practicing medicine has led to role confusion In attending physician-patient-consultant relationships.

Type
Special Section: Ethics Consultants and Ethics Consultations
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 477 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Osborne v. Frazor, 58 Tenn. App. 15, 425 SW. 2d 768 (1968), 35 ALR 3d 349 S 5 (1971).Google Scholar

2. Kelly v. Carrol, 36 Wash. 2d 482, 219 P. 2d 79 (1950).Google Scholar

3. Rahn v. United States, 222 F. Supp. 775 (1963).Google Scholar

4. Phillips v. United States, 566 F. Supp. 1 (1981).Google Scholar

5. Dunn, JD. Practice with coproviders. In: Legal Medicine: Legal Dynamics of Medical Encounters. St.Louis, Missouri: CV Mosby Co., 1988: 400–1.Google Scholar

6. Engelhardt, HT, McCullough, LB. Confidentiality in the consultation liaison process: ethical dimensions and conflicts. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 1979; 2: 403–13.Google Scholar

7. Tumulty, PA. The Effective Clinician. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1973.Google Scholar

8. Siegler, T. Medical consultations in the contest of the physician-patient relationship. In: Agich, GJ, ed. Responsibility in Health Care. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1982: 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Agich, GJ. Roles and responsibilities: theoretical issues in the definition of consultation liaison psychiatry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1985; 10: 105–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Goldman, L, Lee, T, Rudd, P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Archives of Internal Medicine 1983; 143: 1753–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Dinubile, MJ. Subspecialty consultations in internal medicine: uses, misuses, and abuses. Journal of General and Internal Medicine 1988; 3: 589–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. Gert, B, Nelson, WA, Culver, CM. Moral theory and neurology. Neurological Clinics of North America 1989; 7: 681–96.Google Scholar

13. Bowie, NE. Role as a moral concept in health care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1982; 7: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14. Klein, LE, Levine, DM, Moore, RD et al. , The preoperative consultation: response to internists' recommendations. Archives of Internal Medicine 1983; 143: 743–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15. Ratzan, RM. Unsolicited medical opinion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1985; 10: 147–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16. Moseley, R. Excuse me, but you have a melanoma on your neck! Unsolicited medical opinions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1985; 10: 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. American Medical Association. Principles of Medical Ethics, VI. In Current Opinions of the Judicial Council of the American Medical Association, IX. Chicago, 1981.Google Scholar