Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:58:18.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dignity: One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Still Counting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

DORIS SCHROEDER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.

The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.

The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.

All submitted papers are peer reviewed. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala at [email protected].

Type
Dissecting Bioethics
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 118 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. BBC News. US urges Iran to end violence; 2009 Jun 21; available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8111242.stm (last accessed 9 Jul 2009).

2. Deutsche Welle. French legislators worried about the rise of the burka; 2009 Jun 18; available at http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4399834,00.html (last accessed 9 Jul 2009).

3. Muslim Women's League. Gender equality in Islam; 1995 Sep; available at http://www.mwlusa.org/topics/equality/gender.html (last accessed 9 Jul 2009).

4. Ubuntu can be captured in the sentence “I am because we are.” It denotes an individual's lifelong bond with her community and the duties and privileges derived from the bond. Archbishop Desmond Tutu, in his book No Future Without Forgiveness (New York: Random House; 1999, p. 34ff) says: ”Ubuntu is very difficult to render into a Western language. … It is to say, 'My humanity is caught up, is inextricably bound up, in what is yours.'”

5. Schroeder D, Banisadr AH. Dignity—East and West (forthcoming).

6. Macklin R. Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 2003;327:1419–20.

7. Kuhse H. Is there a tension between autonomy and dignity? In: Kemp P, Rendtorff J, Mattson Johansen N, eds. Bioethics and Biolaw, Vol. II: Four Ethical Principles. Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law; 2000:61–74 at p. 74.

8. Birnbacher D. Mehrdeutigkeiten im Begriff der Menschenwürde. Aufklärung und Kritik 1995: Sonderheft 1; available at http://www.gkpn.de/singer2.htm (last accessed 17 Jul 2009).

9. Schopenhauer A. Preisschrift über das Fundament der Moral. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag; 1977:64ff, 165–7.

10. Schroeder D. Dignity: Two riddles and four concepts. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2008;17:230-8.

11. Serious about his supermodel; Mail Online, 2009 Jul 8; available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-506438/Serious-supermodel-French-President-Sarkozy-says-hell-married--secret.html (last accessed 19 Jul 2009).

12. Kant I. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag; 1990:74 (434ff).

13. See note 12, Kant 1990:74 (434ff).

14. Wood AW. Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999:115.

15. Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor M, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997:43. (4:436).

16. Wood AW. Keynote Address to the Conference on Dignity and Law, Cape Town University Law School, July 2007; available at http://www.stanford.edu/~allenw/webpapers/keynote2007.doc (last accessed 17 Jul 2009).

17. I retain the term inviolable to capture Kant's demand that dignity cannot be lost through evil conduct; rational beings can under no circumstances lose it. He writes: "I cannot deny all respect even to a vicious man.” See note 11, Kant 1990:110 (463)—my translation. Kant himself did not occupy himself with questions of irrecoverable loss of rationality.

18. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights; available at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ (last accessed 19 Jul 2009).

19. European Constitution; available at http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Treaties/Treaty_Const.htm (last accessed 19 Jul 2009).

20. Markwell H. End-of-life: A Catholic view. Lancet 2005;366:1132–5 at p. 1132.

21. Rigali JF, Lori WE. Human dignity and the end of life, America 2008:199(3)13–5 at p. 15.

22. John Paul II. Evangelium Vitae; 1995; available at http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae_en.html (last accessed 19 Jul 2009).

23. Lee P. Personhood, dignity, suicide and euthanasia. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2001;1(3):329–44; available at http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/leep/leep_01dignity1.html (last accessed 15 Jul 2009).

24. Vautier BH. Definitions of death. In: Kilner JF, Pellegrino ED, Miller AB, eds. Dignity and Dying: A Christian Appraisal. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans; 1996:96–104; available at http://www.theologymatters.com/TMIssues/Mayjun97.pdf (last accessed 15 Jul 2009).

25. Pope John Paul II. Address of John Paul II to the participants in the International Congress on “Life Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas” March 2004; available at http://www.wf-f.org/JPIILifeSustaining0304.html (last accessed 17 Jul 2009).

26. See note 22, John Paul II 1995.

27. For an excellent overview of diverse Catholic views on PVS patients, see Part 4, Catholic Controversies in: Caplan AL, McCartney JJ, Sisti DA, eds. The Case of Terri Schiavo—Ethics at the End of Life. New York: Prometheus Books; 2006:177–246.

28. Beyleveld D, Brownsword R. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:58.

29. For a justification of this claim, see note 5, Schroeder, Banisadr, forthcoming.

30. This point was suggested to me by Suzy Killmeister and Andrew Alexandra, whom I thank.

31. See note 10, Schroeder 2008.