Article contents
The Caduceus in court: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in The Netherlands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
Extract
As ethics committees become involved in discussing the propriety of euthanasia and assisted suicide, and as healthcare providers begin to seriously consider whether they might ever have a role in hastening the dying process, many have looked to The Netherlands as the only real example of a nation that permits (or, at least, excuses) euthanasia in limited circumstances. Unfortunately, partisans in the Dutch debate have often written about the Dutch experience as advocates rather than as neutral observers. Some have argued that euthanasia, which, they claim, is rarely actually practiced, is universally accepted within The Netherlands; others have reported that the Dutch social fabric has been rended irreparably by what they claim, is a practice far more widespread than is generally understood. The debate in the United States has also been colored by a misunderstanding of the legal regulation of euthanasia in The Netherlands.
- Type
- The Caduceus in court
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1. Dillmann, RJM, Legemaate, J. Euthanasia in The Netherlands: the state of the legal debate. European journal of Health Law 1994;1:81–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Leenen, HJJ. Dying with dignity; developments in the field of euthanasia in The Netherlands. Medicine and Law 1989;8:517–26.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Leenen, HJJ, Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. Force majeure (legal necessity): justification for active termination of life in the case of severely handicapped newborns after forgoing treatment. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993;2:271–4 (especially note 1).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM et al. , Life-terminating acts without explicit request of patient. The Lancet 1993;341:1196–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Van der Wal, G. Unrequested termination of life: is it permissible? Bioethics 1993;7:330–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. See note 2. Leenen, . 1989;9:517–26.Google Scholar
7. Leenen, HJJ. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. In: Byrne, P, ed. Medicine, Medical Ethics and the Value of Life. Chicester/New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990:1–14.Google Scholar
8. See note 7. Leenen, . 1990.Google Scholar
9. See note 3. Leenen, , Ciesielski-Carlucci, . 1993;2:271–4.Google Scholar
10. Royal Dutch Medical Association. Vision on Euthanasia. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Medical Association, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Van der Wal, G, Dillmann, RJM. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. British Medical Journal 1994; 308:1346–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L et al. , Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Lancet 1991;338:669–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ. The Remmelink study: two years later. Hastings Center Report 1993;23:24–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. See note 1. Dillmann, . 1994;1:81–7.Google Scholar
15. See note 12. Van der Maas, PJ et al. , 1991:669–74.Google Scholar
16. Ciesielski-Carlucci, C, Kimsma, G. The impact of reporting cases of euthanasia in Holland: a patient and family perspective. Bioethics 1994;8:151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. See note 2. Leenen, . 1989:517–26.Google Scholar
18. Bakker, DJ. Active euthanasia: is mercy killing the killing of mercy? In: Mishin, RI, ed. Euthanasia: The Good of the Patient, the Good of Society. Frederick, Maryland: 1992:83–94.Google Scholar
19. See note 12. Van der Maas, PJ et al. , 1991:669–74.Google Scholar
20. Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ. Dances with data. Bioethics 1993;7:323–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. See note 13. Van Delden, et al. , 1993;23:24–7.Google Scholar
22. See note 20. Van Delden, et al. , 1993;7:323–9.Google Scholar
23. Sheldon, T. Dutch prosecutors get tough on euthanasia. British Medical Journal 1994;308:1119–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. See note 4. Pijnenborg, L et al. , 1993;341:1196–9.Google Scholar
25. See note 5. Van der Wal, G. 1993;7:330–9.Google Scholar
26. See note 3. Leenen, HJJ, Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. 1993;2:271–4.Google Scholar
27. See note 5. Van der Wal, G. 1993;7:330–9.Google Scholar
28. Gevers, JKM. Legislation on euthanasia: recent developments in The Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics 1992;18:138–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. See note 11. Van der Wal, , Dillmann, . 1994;308:1346–9.Google Scholar
30. Ward, BJ, Tate, PA. Attitudes among NHS doctors to requests for euthanasia. British Medical Journal 1994;308:1332–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Kenis, Y. Physicians and active euthanasia: practice and opinions (original in French). Bulletin du Conseil National Ordre des Medians 1994;63:53–61.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by