Article contents
Alternative Dispute Resolution and Research Misconduct
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2009
Extract
“Any bad settlement,” the wise patent litigator Elmer S. Albritton once observed, “is better than a good lawsuit.” Given the notorious strain of court proceedings and the recognition that settlement does not always prove attainable, a popular movement has recently arisen in favor of “alternative dispute resolution” (or ADR). Indeed it has seemed to many who have participated as committee members, witnesses, or respondents in scientific misconduct cases that there ought to be some method of resolving such matters that is less vexing than traditional adjudication.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997
References
Notes
1. Wheeler, DL. A bitter feud over authorship. Chronicle of Higher Education 1995;41(06 2):A8.Google Scholar
2. Such processes are mandatory under federal regulations, 42 C.F.R. §50.103.
3. Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services. Newsletter 1995;March: 2.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by