No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The domestication of opera
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2008
Extract
At the end of the last century opera started to shed elements of its many-sided and hybrid character. Of course there are numerous exceptions, but in general the genre becomes tighter, the expansive five-act form that triumphed at Paris in the middle of the nineteenth century is rejected and several elements, such as the ballet, dismissed as distractions. Musical structures, influenced – among other things – by Wagner's leitmotif system, become denser and even large scores exhibit an exceptional thematic homogeneity. Most striking, all those bandits, pirates, gods and gypsies make way for more conventional figures in mundane urban and rural settings. The fantastic is displaced by the domestic – or, if the old stage-figures survive, they do so, as I will suggest below, in an altered and diluted form that makes them proper subjects for ‘play’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993
References
1 Freud, Sigmund, Three Essays, International Psycho-Analytical Library No. 57 (London 1935), 109.Google Scholar
2 Freud, Sigmund, Civilisation and Its Discontents, International Psycho-Analytical Library No. 17 (London, 1930), 25.Google Scholar
3 Freud, , Civilisation, 32.Google Scholar
4 A fuller account of this argument can be found in my article: ‘Women as Image and Narrative in Wagner's Parsifal’, this journal, 3/2 (07 1991), 109–24.Google Scholar
5 See Gilsenbach, Reimar, ‘Die Verfolgung der Sinti – ein Weg, der nach Auschwitz führte’, in Feinderklärung and Prävention: Kriminalbiologie, Zigeunerforschung and Asozialenpolitik, Wolfgang Ayaß et al. (Berlin, 1988), 19.Google Scholar Gilsenbach also notes how the language used about the Gypsies was later employed against the Jews.
6 Freud, , Civilisation, part V, passim.Google Scholar
7 See Schopf, Roland, ‘Bürgerfluch und Bürgersehnsucht’, in Zigeunerleben, ed. Hohmann, Joachim S. and Schopf, Roland (Darmstadt, 1980), 64.Google Scholar
8 Gilsenbach, , ‘Die Verfolgung’ (see n. 5), 23.Google Scholar
9 See Ficowski, Jercy, ‘Die Vernichtung’, 107Google Scholar, and Rüdiger, Gerhard F., ‘Jeder Stein ist ein Blutstropfen: Zigeuner in Auschwitz-Birkenau’, 143Google Scholar; both in In Auschwitz vergast, bis heute verfolgt, ed. Zülch, Tilman (Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1979).Google Scholar
10 Ficowski, , 109.Google Scholar
11 Descombes, Vincent, Modern French Philosophy (Cambridge, 1980), 139Google Scholar; quoted in Holquist, Michael, ‘The Surd Heard: Bakhtin and Derrida’, in Literature and History: Theoretical Problems and Russian Case Studies, ed. Morson, Gary Saul (Stanford, 1986), 143.Google Scholar