The Cambridge Law Journal: Volume 69 - Issue 1

The Cambridge Law Journal

Only show content I have access to (2)

Over 3 years (30)

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
The Cambridge Law Journal
ISSN: 0008-1973

EISSN: 1469-2139

URL: /core/journals/cambridge-law-journal
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

The Cambridge Law Journal

Refine listing

Actions for selected content:

Volume 69 - Issue 1 - March 2010

Case and Comment

THE GOVERNMENT VERSUS THE OMBUDSMAN: WHAT ROLE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW?

PROPORTIONALITY NOT PRESUMPTION

OUT-OF-COURT (OUT OF SIGHT) DISPOSALS

NEGLIGENCE AND DEFENDANTS WITH SPECIAL SKILLS

MESOTHELIOMA AND RISK AIRED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

WHO PAYS FOR THE SUB-CONTRACTOR'S NEGLIGENCE? VICARIOUS LIABILITY AND LIABILITY FOR “EXTRA-HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES” RE-EXAMINED

AM I MY (DRUNKEN) NEIGHBOUR'S KEEPER?

LEGISLATE IN HASTE, REPENT AT LEISURE

BANK CHARGES IN THE SUPREME COURT

THE CONTRACTUAL NATURE OF REINSURANCE

ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS AND NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION CLAUSES

IDENTIFICATION OF MONEY AT COMMON LAW

SUBROGATION, ACCOUNTING AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT

VIRTUAL ASSIGNMENTS AND LEASEHOLD ALIENATION COVENANTS

PRE-NUPS, PRIVATE AUTONOMY AND PATERNALISM

A GOOD DAY AND SALUTORY WARNING FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

Articles

LORD RADCLIFFE OUT OF TIME

INTERPRETING THE NEW CONCEPT OF HEARSAY

“A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE IN ALL BUT NAME”: DISCUSSING THE NATURE AND PURPOSES OF THE DRAFT COMMON FRAME OF REFERENCE

THE COURT'S JURISDICTION TO RESTRAIN A CREDITOR FROM PRESENTING A WINDING UP PETITION WHERE A CROSS-CLAIM EXISTS

The Cambridge Law Journal

Refine listing

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Volume 69 - Issue 1 - March 2010

Case and Comment

Articles