Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T07:51:17.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suggestions Regarding the Liability of Corporations for the Torts of their Servants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Get access

Extract

‘ … It is certain’, says Winfield, in writing of the liability for torts committed by servants of corporations, ‘that, whatever the law may be where the corporation has expressly authorised the commission of an ultra vires tort, no authority to the servant or agent to commit such a tort can be implied’ : and he illustrates his point by the well-known case of Poulton v. L. & S. W. Ry. Poulton, in terms of an arrangement which he had made with the railway company, was entitled to free carriage of a horse. At the end of the journey the local stationmaster demanded payment for the carriage of the horse; Poulton refused to pay, and the stationmaster detained him. The Court of Appeal held that the railway company was empowered to detain goods, but not persons, for non-payment of carriage; that accordingly they had no power to detain Poulton, even on the assumption that he had wrongfully taken the horse by train without paying; that there could be no authority for the arrest implied to the stationmaster; and that his employers were not liable for his tortious act.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Law of Torts, 4th ed., p. 106.

2 (1867) L.R. 2 Q.B. 534.

3 The Law of Torts, 10th ed., p. 55.

4 1922 S.C. (H.L.) 144.

5 At p. 154.

6 (1861) 3 E. & E. 672.

7 (1872) L.R. 8 Q.B. 36.

8 (1894) 21 R. 1085.

9 See ‘Corporate Liability in Tort and the Doctrine of Ultra Vires’, Essays in Jurisprudence and the Common Law, by A. L. Goodhart (1931), p. 91.

10 1945 S.C. 175.

11 By Lord Moncrieff at p. 180.

12 [1948] 2 All E.R. 935.

13 (1949) 65 L.Q.R. 26.