Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:35:32.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Furtum and Larceny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

P. W. Duff
Get access

Extract

Anyone who studies side by side the Roman law of furtum and the English law of larceny must be struck by the fact that, whereas Roman thieves and English thieves behave much alike, Roman lawyers in discussing theft usually assume that a civil action is being brought, for money damages, but English lawyers are mainly concerned with criminal prosecution, leading to a fine, or imprisonment, or, in former times, to the gallows.

Type
Articles
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 1954 , pp. 86 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an illuminating, but purely academic, discussion of this fragment, see Olivecrona, Karl, Three Essays in Roman Law, Copenhagen, 1949, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar