Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:42:32.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Eavesdropping and Anomalies in the Law of Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

Get access

Extract

There is nothing wrong with the Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Aujla [1998] 2 Cr.App.R. 16. Almost everything is wrong, however, with the law that the court was called on to interpret, and the decision is interesting because it shows this up.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors, 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)